18,449
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Water Absorption Index and Water Solubility Index Prediction for Extruded Food Products

&
Pages 157-168 | Received 25 Nov 2009, Accepted 23 Feb 2010, Published online: 22 Dec 2011

Figures & data

Table 1 Number of papers and literature data which were used for analysis

Table 2 Standard experimental error (), standard deviation between experimental and calculated values (), parameters of the model and the experimental limits of die temperature (T), feed moisture content (X), screw speed (S), and the mixture (M) for the WAI prediction

Table 3 Standard experimental error (), standard deviation between experimental and calculated values (), parameters of the model and the experimental limits of die temperature (T), feed moisture content (X), screw speed (S), and the mixture (M) for the WSI prediction

Figure 1 Effect of (a) die temperature °C; (b) feed moisture content %; (c) screw speed rpm on WAI for barley (▴), corn (•), oat (■), rice (x), wheat (◊), beans (○), and starch (□). Lines are calculated model values using parameters given in .

Figure 1 Effect of (a) die temperature °C; (b) feed moisture content %; (c) screw speed rpm on WAI for barley (▴), corn (•), oat (■), rice (x), wheat (◊), beans (○), and starch (□). Lines are calculated model values using parameters given in Table 2.

Figure 2 Effect of (a) die temperature °C; (b) feed moisture content %; (c) screw speed rpm on WSI for corn (•), oat (■), rice (x), wheat (◊), beans (○), and starch (□). Lines are calculated model values using parameters given in .

Figure 2 Effect of (a) die temperature °C; (b) feed moisture content %; (c) screw speed rpm on WSI for corn (•), oat (■), rice (x), wheat (◊), beans (○), and starch (□). Lines are calculated model values using parameters given in Table 3.

Figure 3 Effect of (a) die temperature °C; (b) feed moisture content %; (c) mix lever % on WAI for: (1) (▲) corn:DDG, (2) (•) corn:lentil, (3) (■) rice:DDG, (4) (x) wheat:DDG, 5 (◊) corn starch:WPC, (6) (○) rice starch:SPI, and (7) (□) potato:DDG. Lines are calculated model values using parameters given in .

Figure 3 Effect of (a) die temperature °C; (b) feed moisture content %; (c) mix lever % on WAI for: (1) (▲) corn:DDG, (2) (•) corn:lentil, (3) (■) rice:DDG, (4) (x) wheat:DDG, 5 (◊) corn starch:WPC, (6) (○) rice starch:SPI, and (7) (□) potato:DDG. Lines are calculated model values using parameters given in Table 2.

Figure 4 The lack of fit () and standard experimental error () as a function of the number of parameters: (a) predicted model for WAI of rice; (b) predicted model for WSI of blend corn:lentil.

Figure 4 The lack of fit () and standard experimental error () as a function of the number of parameters: (a) predicted model for WAI of rice; (b) predicted model for WSI of blend corn:lentil.

Table 4 Confidence intervals (95%) for the parameters of the model for the WAI prediction

Table 5 Confidence intervals (95%) for the parameters of the model for the WSI prediction

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.