Figures & data
Table 1 Size classification of whole pod and kernel
Table 2 Internal (d i )–external (d k ) diameter relationships and shell thickness for peanut types
Figure 2 Free compression test apparatus. 1, main body; 2, handle; 3, moving platform; 4, fixed platform; 5, deformation indicator; 6, precision deformation indicator; 7, specimen.
Figure 1 Peanut loading positions.
Figure 5 Force-deformation (F-d) curves for longitudinal peanut loading.
Figure 4 Force-deformation (F-d) curves for peanut loading perpendicular to split plane.
Figure 3 Force-deformation (F-d) curves for peanut loading parallel to split plane.
Table 3 Stiffness (Nmm− 1) of the whole pod
Figure 6 Impact test mechanism. 1, body; 2, top cover; 3, metal bar; 4, hammer; 5, fix plate; 6, nut; 7, specimen.
Figure 15 Breakage, damaged percentages vs. dynamic pressure for rubber-steel.
Figure 16 Breakage, damaged percentages vs. dynamic pressure for steel-steel longitudinal.
Figure 9 Breakage, damaged percentages vs. dynamic pressure for steel-iron grate (parallel).
Figure 14 Breakage, damaged percentages vs. dynamic pressure for wood-iron grate (perpendicular).
Figure 11 Breakage, damaged percentages vs. dynamic pressure for steel-steel.
Figure 10 Breakage, damaged percentages vs. dynamic pressure for steel-iron grate (perpendicular).
Figure 13 Breakage, damaged percentages vs. dynamic pressure for wood-iron grate (parallel).
Figure 8 Breakage, damaged percentages vs. dynamic pressure for rubber-iron grate (perpendicular).
Figure 7 Breakage, damaged percentages vs. dynamic pressure for rubber-iron grate (parallel).
Figure 12 Breakage, damaged percentages vs. dynamic pressure for wood-steel.
