Figures & data
TABLE 1 Apparent amylose content (AAC) of selected rice varieties
FIGURE 1 Change in pasting temperature (onset of gelatinization) with increasing apparent amylose content (AAC).
![FIGURE 1 Change in pasting temperature (onset of gelatinization) with increasing apparent amylose content (AAC).](/cms/asset/2d7a16d9-eb47-44f1-a9d6-0913fc894121/ljfp_a_1092163_f0001_oc.jpg)
FIGURE 2 Representative RVA curves of selected glutinous varieties (TDK11, TDK8, and HMN) at standard RVA analysis.
![FIGURE 2 Representative RVA curves of selected glutinous varieties (TDK11, TDK8, and HMN) at standard RVA analysis.](/cms/asset/4a0b4366-bc3e-4da5-8fb5-d2d3f59fc9bf/ljfp_a_1092163_f0002_b.gif)
FIGURE 3 Effect of soaking time and temperature on the pasting temperature (Ptemp) of three different glutinous rice varieties; (a) TDK11, (b) TDK8, (c) HMN, and two non-glutinous rice varieties; (d) IR64, and (e) DG.
![FIGURE 3 Effect of soaking time and temperature on the pasting temperature (Ptemp) of three different glutinous rice varieties; (a) TDK11, (b) TDK8, (c) HMN, and two non-glutinous rice varieties; (d) IR64, and (e) DG.](/cms/asset/0c6d4d05-f336-4695-a0e4-502125ba24cb/ljfp_a_1092163_f0003_b.gif)
FIGURE 4 Effect of soaking time and temperature on the peak viscosity (Vp) of three different glutinous rice varieties; (a) TDK11, (b) TDK8, (c) HMN, and two non-glutinous rice varieties; (d) IR64 and (e) DG.
![FIGURE 4 Effect of soaking time and temperature on the peak viscosity (Vp) of three different glutinous rice varieties; (a) TDK11, (b) TDK8, (c) HMN, and two non-glutinous rice varieties; (d) IR64 and (e) DG.](/cms/asset/5b186eef-7a7d-45a0-af55-5d3327caa2d8/ljfp_a_1092163_f0004_b.gif)
FIGURE 5 Effect of soaking time and temperature on the breakdown viscosity (BD) of three different glutinous rice varieties; (a) TDK11, (b) TDK8, (c) HMN, and two non-glutinous rice varieties; (d) IR64 and (e) DG.
![FIGURE 5 Effect of soaking time and temperature on the breakdown viscosity (BD) of three different glutinous rice varieties; (a) TDK11, (b) TDK8, (c) HMN, and two non-glutinous rice varieties; (d) IR64 and (e) DG.](/cms/asset/9bcb0321-d53b-456e-8039-2039e61b3ddd/ljfp_a_1092163_f0005_b.gif)
FIGURE 6 Effect of soaking time and temperature on the trough viscosity (Vt) of three different glutinous rice varieties; (a) TDK11, (b) TDK8, (c) HMN, and two non-glutinous rice varieties; (d) IR64 and (e) DG.
![FIGURE 6 Effect of soaking time and temperature on the trough viscosity (Vt) of three different glutinous rice varieties; (a) TDK11, (b) TDK8, (c) HMN, and two non-glutinous rice varieties; (d) IR64 and (e) DG.](/cms/asset/c185226f-2666-425a-a82d-b173c3f9986c/ljfp_a_1092163_f0006_b.gif)
FIGURE 7 Effect of soaking time and temperature on the setback viscosity (SB) of three different glutinous rice varieties; (a) TDK11, (b) TDK8, (c) HMN, and two non-glutinous rice varieties; (d) IR64 and (e) DG.
![FIGURE 7 Effect of soaking time and temperature on the setback viscosity (SB) of three different glutinous rice varieties; (a) TDK11, (b) TDK8, (c) HMN, and two non-glutinous rice varieties; (d) IR64 and (e) DG.](/cms/asset/1e6825aa-db7a-4f93-bd81-b6cb474bdc7f/ljfp_a_1092163_f0007_b.gif)