Figures & data
Table 1. Comparison of the content of volatile compounds (ng mL−1) in milk treated with high hydrostatic pressure and UV-C radiation.
Figure 1. Principal component analysis A and linear discriminant analysis B of volatile compounds of (1) untreated; (2) UV-C-treated; and (3) high hydrostatic pressure treated (200 MPa [2 × 2.5 min]; 4: 400 MPa [2 × 2.5 min]; 5: 600 MPa [2 × 2.5 min]; 6: 200 MPa [1 × 5 min]; 7: 400 MPa [1 × 5 min]; 8: 600 MPa [1 × 5min]) milk samples by e-nose.
![Figure 1. Principal component analysis A and linear discriminant analysis B of volatile compounds of (1) untreated; (2) UV-C-treated; and (3) high hydrostatic pressure treated (200 MPa [2 × 2.5 min]; 4: 400 MPa [2 × 2.5 min]; 5: 600 MPa [2 × 2.5 min]; 6: 200 MPa [1 × 5 min]; 7: 400 MPa [1 × 5 min]; 8: 600 MPa [1 × 5min]) milk samples by e-nose.](/cms/asset/8e56cf29-01ab-40b5-ba8b-b8c7cd2e7faa/ljfp_a_1217876_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. Principal component analysis A and linear discriminant analysis B of (1) untreated; (2) UV-C-treated; and (3) high hydrostatic pressure treated (200 MPa [2 × 2.5 min]; 4: 400 MPa [2 × 2.5 min]; 5: 600 MPa [2 × 2.5 min]; 6: 200 MPa [1 × 5 min]; 7: 400 MPa [1 × 5 min]; 8: 600 MPa [1 × 5 min]) milk samples by e-tongue.
![Figure 2. Principal component analysis A and linear discriminant analysis B of (1) untreated; (2) UV-C-treated; and (3) high hydrostatic pressure treated (200 MPa [2 × 2.5 min]; 4: 400 MPa [2 × 2.5 min]; 5: 600 MPa [2 × 2.5 min]; 6: 200 MPa [1 × 5 min]; 7: 400 MPa [1 × 5 min]; 8: 600 MPa [1 × 5 min]) milk samples by e-tongue.](/cms/asset/b3717a5b-8014-43e2-ae61-17a3ac5c7194/ljfp_a_1217876_f0002_oc.jpg)