1,667
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Chemometric evaluation of binary mixtures of alginate and polysaccharide biopolymers as carriers for microencapsulation of green tea polyphenols

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 1971-1986 | Received 19 Jun 2016, Accepted 15 Aug 2016, Published online: 05 Jan 2017

Figures & data

Table 1. Particle size distribution and textural parameters of formulated hydrogel microbeads encapsulating green tea bioactive compounds.

Figure 1. Encapsulation efficiency (%) of A: total polyphenols; B: epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG); and C: caffeine contents (mg/g beads) entrapped in the formulated microparticles.

Figure 1. Encapsulation efficiency (%) of A: total polyphenols; B: epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG); and C: caffeine contents (mg/g beads) entrapped in the formulated microparticles.

Figure 2. Release profiles of total polyphenols from the formulated microbeads composed of 80:20 binary mixtures (a, b) and 70:30 binary mixtures (c, d) expressed as mg GAE/g beads (a, c), and percentage (%) of cumulative release (b, d).

Figure 2. Release profiles of total polyphenols from the formulated microbeads composed of 80:20 binary mixtures (a, b) and 70:30 binary mixtures (c, d) expressed as mg GAE/g beads (a, c), and percentage (%) of cumulative release (b, d).

Figure 3. FT-IR spectra of plain biopolymers (alginate, polysaccharides A: locust bean gum; B: xanthan; C: pectin; D: carageenan; F: starch; and G: HPMC) and their binary mixtures.

Figure 3. FT-IR spectra of plain biopolymers (alginate, polysaccharides A: locust bean gum; B: xanthan; C: pectin; D: carageenan; F: starch; and G: HPMC) and their binary mixtures.

Figure 4. FT-IR spectra of A: plain biopolymers alginate, agar and their binary mixtures; B: green tea (GT) encapuslated in the alginate-agar binary mixture; and C: microencapsulates of green tea in all evaluated binary mixtures as carriers.

Figure 4. FT-IR spectra of A: plain biopolymers alginate, agar and their binary mixtures; B: green tea (GT) encapuslated in the alginate-agar binary mixture; and C: microencapsulates of green tea in all evaluated binary mixtures as carriers.

Table 2. Principal component weighting of the data set.

Figure 5. Plot of A: PC-1 versus PC-2; and B: PC-2 versus PC-3 for the formulated microbeads composed of 80:20 and 70:30 binary mixtures.

Figure 5. Plot of A: PC-1 versus PC-2; and B: PC-2 versus PC-3 for the formulated microbeads composed of 80:20 and 70:30 binary mixtures.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.