912
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Detection of aflD gene in contaminated pistachio with Aspergillus flavus by DNA based electrochemical biosensor

, , , &
Pages S119-S130 | Received 22 Sep 2016, Accepted 01 Feb 2017, Published online: 03 May 2017

Figures & data

Scheme 1. The glassy carbon electrode was coated with AuNPs (AuNP—GCE). A specific ssDNA probe of aflD gene was immobilized on AuNP–GCE. In the absence of the target DNA, the flexible ssDNA probe supports efficient contact between the [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− reducer and AuNP—GCE, there is a low electron transfer resistance (Ret) of the electrochemical DNA sensor. After the hybridization, a rigid probe-target duplex is formed which contact between the [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− reducer and AuNP—GCE was prevented. This leads to an increasing in the Ret of the electrochemical DNA sensor.

Scheme 1. The glassy carbon electrode was coated with AuNPs (AuNP—GCE). A specific ssDNA probe of aflD gene was immobilized on AuNP–GCE. In the absence of the target DNA, the flexible ssDNA probe supports efficient contact between the [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− reducer and AuNP—GCE, there is a low electron transfer resistance (Ret) of the electrochemical DNA sensor. After the hybridization, a rigid probe-target duplex is formed which contact between the [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− reducer and AuNP—GCE was prevented. This leads to an increasing in the Ret of the electrochemical DNA sensor.

Table 1. DNA probe, target, and primers.

Figure 1. Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR product. ((af): PCR product of A. flavus. (bf): PCR product of contaminated pistachio. (cf): control experiment without any genes).

Figure 1. Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR product. ((af): PCR product of A. flavus. (bf): PCR product of contaminated pistachio. (cf): control experiment without any genes).

Figure 2. a. Cyclic voltammograms of bare electrode and AuNP electrodeposited electrode (potential scanning: −0.2–0.6 V, Scan rate: 50 mV s−1, in 10 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4−). b. Cyclic voltammogram recorded at AuNP–GCE (potential scanning: −0.2–1.6 V, Scan rate: 50 mV s−1, N = 10, in 0.1 M NaNO3 aqueous solution with 0.25 mM HAuCl4 · 3H2O and 0.01 M H2SO4).

Figure 2. a. Cyclic voltammograms of bare electrode and AuNP electrodeposited electrode (potential scanning: −0.2–0.6 V, Scan rate: 50 mV s−1, in 10 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4−). b. Cyclic voltammogram recorded at AuNP–GCE (potential scanning: −0.2–1.6 V, Scan rate: 50 mV s−1, N = 10, in 0.1 M NaNO3 aqueous solution with 0.25 mM HAuCl4 · 3H2O and 0.01 M H2SO4).

Figure 3. SEM images of AuNP–GCE provided by electrodeposition from a 0.1 M NaNO3 aqua solution with 0.25 mM HAuCl4·3H2O and 0.01 M H2SO4.

Figure 3. SEM images of AuNP–GCE provided by electrodeposition from a 0.1 M NaNO3 aqua solution with 0.25 mM HAuCl4·3H2O and 0.01 M H2SO4.

Figure 4. EIS of different modified electrode. (EIS was performed in a base solution of 10 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− with 0.1 M KCl and 0.1 M PBS buffer pH 7.4. EIS was registered in the frequency ranging from 0.1 to 105 Hz at a constant potential EIS of 150 mV with an alternating voltage of 10 mV).

Figure 4. EIS of different modified electrode. (EIS was performed in a base solution of 10 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− with 0.1 M KCl and 0.1 M PBS buffer pH 7.4. EIS was registered in the frequency ranging from 0.1 to 105 Hz at a constant potential EIS of 150 mV with an alternating voltage of 10 mV).

Figure 5. EIS of different incubation time of probe. (EIS was performed in a base solution of 10 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− with 0.1 M KCl and 0.1 M PBS buffer pH 7.4. EIS was registered in the frequency ranging from 0.1 to 105 Hz at a constant potential EIS of 150 mV with an alternating voltage of 10 mV).

Figure 5. EIS of different incubation time of probe. (EIS was performed in a base solution of 10 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− with 0.1 M KCl and 0.1 M PBS buffer pH 7.4. EIS was registered in the frequency ranging from 0.1 to 105 Hz at a constant potential EIS of 150 mV with an alternating voltage of 10 mV).

Figure 6. EIS of different incubation time of hybridization. (EIS was performed in a base solution of 10 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− with 0.1 M KCl and 0.1 M PBS buffer pH 7.4. EIS was registered in the frequency ranging from 0.1 to 105 Hz at a constant potential EIS of 150 mV with an alternating voltage of 10 mV).

Figure 6. EIS of different incubation time of hybridization. (EIS was performed in a base solution of 10 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− with 0.1 M KCl and 0.1 M PBS buffer pH 7.4. EIS was registered in the frequency ranging from 0.1 to 105 Hz at a constant potential EIS of 150 mV with an alternating voltage of 10 mV).

Figure 7. EIS of hybridization process at a different concentration of DNA target. (a) probe; (b) 0.001 µM; (c) 0.005 µM; (d) 0.01 µM; (e) 0.05 µM; (f) 0.1 µM; (g) 1.0 µM; (h) 10 µM. (EIS was performed in a base solution of 10 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− with 0.1 M KCl and 0.1 M PBS buffer pH 7.4. EIS was registered in the frequency ranging from 0.1 to 105 Hz at a constant potential EIS of 150 mV with an alternating voltage of 10 mV).

Figure 7. EIS of hybridization process at a different concentration of DNA target. (a) probe; (b) 0.001 µM; (c) 0.005 µM; (d) 0.01 µM; (e) 0.05 µM; (f) 0.1 µM; (g) 1.0 µM; (h) 10 µM. (EIS was performed in a base solution of 10 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− with 0.1 M KCl and 0.1 M PBS buffer pH 7.4. EIS was registered in the frequency ranging from 0.1 to 105 Hz at a constant potential EIS of 150 mV with an alternating voltage of 10 mV).

Figure 8. EIS of PCR product. (af): PCR product of Aspergillus flavus. (bf): PCR product of contaminated pistachio. (cf): control experiment, without any genes. (R): random 76-mer sequence. (EIS was performed in a base solution of 10 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− with 0.1 M KCl and 0.1 M PBS buffer pH 7.4. EIS was registered in the frequency ranging from 0.1 to 105 Hz at a constant potential EIS of 150 mV with an alternating voltage of 10 mV).

Figure 8. EIS of PCR product. (af): PCR product of Aspergillus flavus. (bf): PCR product of contaminated pistachio. (cf): control experiment, without any genes. (R): random 76-mer sequence. (EIS was performed in a base solution of 10 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− with 0.1 M KCl and 0.1 M PBS buffer pH 7.4. EIS was registered in the frequency ranging from 0.1 to 105 Hz at a constant potential EIS of 150 mV with an alternating voltage of 10 mV).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.