905
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Characterization and bioactivities of polysaccharide from spent Hovenia dulcis peduncles by alkali pretreatment

, &
Pages S416-S429 | Received 24 Oct 2016, Accepted 18 Feb 2017, Published online: 12 Jun 2017

Figures & data

Figure 1. Extraction and characterizations of SHDPs produced by H. dulcis. (A) The HPLC spectrum of SHDPs; (B) UV spectra of SHDPs; (C) DEAE-cellulose chromatography of polysaccharide from spent H. dulcis.

Figure 1. Extraction and characterizations of SHDPs produced by H. dulcis. (A) The HPLC spectrum of SHDPs; (B) UV spectra of SHDPs; (C) DEAE-cellulose chromatography of polysaccharide from spent H. dulcis.

Figure 2. GC chromatograms. (A) SHDPs; (B) monosaccharides reference; (C) fraction of partial acid hydrolysis. Peak: (1) L-rhamnose, (2) D-fucose, (3) L-arabinose, (4) D-xylose, (5) D-mannose, (6) D-glucose, and (7) D-galactose.

Figure 2. GC chromatograms. (A) SHDPs; (B) monosaccharides reference; (C) fraction of partial acid hydrolysis. Peak: (1) L-rhamnose, (2) D-fucose, (3) L-arabinose, (4) D-xylose, (5) D-mannose, (6) D-glucose, and (7) D-galactose.

Figure 3. FTIR spectra. (A) SHDPs; (B) methylated SHDPs.

Figure 3. FTIR spectra. (A) SHDPs; (B) methylated SHDPs.

Table 1. Methylation analysis of SHDPs.

Figure 4. NMR spectra of SHDPs. (A) Citation1H NMR spectrum of SHDPs; (B) Citation13C NMR spectrum of SHDPs.

Figure 4. NMR spectra of SHDPs. (A) Citation1H NMR spectrum of SHDPs; (B) Citation13C NMR spectrum of SHDPs.

Figure 5. Antioxidant activities of SHDPs in vitro. (A) DPPH radical scavenging activity; (B) ABTS radical scavenging activity; (C) FeCitation2+ chelating ability; (D) superoxide radical scavenging activity. Values are means±SD, n = 3. (E) ADH activity. a: p ﹤ 0.05; b: p ﹤ 0.01 versus positive control.

Figure 5. Antioxidant activities of SHDPs in vitro. (A) DPPH radical scavenging activity; (B) ABTS radical scavenging activity; (C) FeCitation2+ chelating ability; (D) superoxide radical scavenging activity. Values are means±SD, n = 3. (E) ADH activity. a: p ﹤ 0.05; b: p ﹤ 0.01 versus positive control.

Figure 6. Effect of SHDPs on ADH activity. a: p ﹤ 0.05; b: p ﹤ 0.01 versus blank control.

Figure 6. Effect of SHDPs on ADH activity. a: p ﹤ 0.05; b: p ﹤ 0.01 versus blank control.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.