Figures & data
Table 1. Purification of the intestinal protease of Scorpaena notata.
Figure 1. (A) Elution profile of S. not-protease after gel filtration chromatography on Toyopearl HW-50 column (0.5 mg of the protein extract was loaded to the column). (B1) Elution profile of S. not-protease on Mono Q-Sepharose anion-exchange chromatography column (0.2 mg of the protein extract was loaded to the column). Elution was carried out with a linear gradient of 0–1 mol L−1 NaCl. (B2) Zymogram detection of proteolytic activity of different fractions (F68, F69, F70, F71, F72, F73, F74) of the purified S. not-protease.
![Figure 1. (A) Elution profile of S. not-protease after gel filtration chromatography on Toyopearl HW-50 column (0.5 mg of the protein extract was loaded to the column). (B1) Elution profile of S. not-protease on Mono Q-Sepharose anion-exchange chromatography column (0.2 mg of the protein extract was loaded to the column). Elution was carried out with a linear gradient of 0–1 mol L−1 NaCl. (B2) Zymogram detection of proteolytic activity of different fractions (F68, F69, F70, F71, F72, F73, F74) of the purified S. not-protease.](/cms/asset/60543de3-8946-412a-b785-e0fbbaf7fbbd/ljfp_a_1368550_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. (A) Elution profile of S. not-protease after gel filtration chromatography on Toyopearl HW-40 column using an FPLC system (15 µg of the purified protease was loaded to the column). Elution volume of S. not-protease is showed by an arrow in the calibration curve. Protein content is shown in continuous line and activity in discontinuous line. (B) SDS–PAGE analysis of the purified S. not-protease. Lane 1, standard molecular weight markers; Lane 2, purified S. not-protease (2 µg).
![Figure 2. (A) Elution profile of S. not-protease after gel filtration chromatography on Toyopearl HW-40 column using an FPLC system (15 µg of the purified protease was loaded to the column). Elution volume of S. not-protease is showed by an arrow in the calibration curve. Protein content is shown in continuous line and activity in discontinuous line. (B) SDS–PAGE analysis of the purified S. not-protease. Lane 1, standard molecular weight markers; Lane 2, purified S. not-protease (2 µg).](/cms/asset/935677d0-0765-4161-836a-ce3c047d3e48/ljfp_a_1368550_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. Effect of temperature on enzyme activity (A) and stability (B). Remaining protease activity was measured under standard assay conditions. Effect of pH on purified S. not-protease activity (C) and stability (D). The stability was estimated as residual enzyme activity after pre-incubation in different buffers for 12 h at 4°C. The results represent mean values of three independent experiments each performed in triplicates and error bars indicate standard deviation.
![Figure 3. Effect of temperature on enzyme activity (A) and stability (B). Remaining protease activity was measured under standard assay conditions. Effect of pH on purified S. not-protease activity (C) and stability (D). The stability was estimated as residual enzyme activity after pre-incubation in different buffers for 12 h at 4°C. The results represent mean values of three independent experiments each performed in triplicates and error bars indicate standard deviation.](/cms/asset/2f303945-9378-4f92-93bb-a7dc87057d60/ljfp_a_1368550_f0003_b.gif)
Table 2. Effect of various enzyme inhibitors on the activity of S. not-protease.†
Table 3. Effect of surfactants on enzyme activity of S. not-protease.†
Table 4. Effect of metal ions on enzyme activity.†
Table 5. Biochemical and kinetic properties of S. not-protease and different fish proteases.
Table 6. Substrate specificity of S. not-protease toward natural substrates.
Figure 5. (A) Enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat gluten at two different concentrations (1% and 3%, w/v) with S. not-protease at an enzyme–substrate ratio of 5:1 (U mg−1). (B) SDS–PAGE analysis of gluten hydrolysate at a concentration of 3% at different reaction times. Lane 1, standard molecular weight markers; Lane 2, gluten supernatant at t = 0; Lanes 3–8, gluten hydrolysate supernatant at t = 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, and 24 h, respectively.
![Figure 5. (A) Enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat gluten at two different concentrations (1% and 3%, w/v) with S. not-protease at an enzyme–substrate ratio of 5:1 (U mg−1). (B) SDS–PAGE analysis of gluten hydrolysate at a concentration of 3% at different reaction times. Lane 1, standard molecular weight markers; Lane 2, gluten supernatant at t = 0; Lanes 3–8, gluten hydrolysate supernatant at t = 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, and 24 h, respectively.](/cms/asset/ca3471a7-97cc-4a57-8349-29423f831429/ljfp_a_1368550_f0005_oc.jpg)