Figures & data
Figure 1. Effects of in-vitro protein oxidization on carbonyl content of heat-induced protein gels during 28 days refrigeration. Note: Control, without oxidative treated samples; Oxidized, pre-oxidative treated samples. Different letters (a, b) are significantly different (P < 0.05) for the same treatment group among difference time, different letters (A, B) are significantly different (P < 0.05) for the same time; Values were presented as means ± standard deviation (n = 3).
![Figure 1. Effects of in-vitro protein oxidization on carbonyl content of heat-induced protein gels during 28 days refrigeration. Note: Control, without oxidative treated samples; Oxidized, pre-oxidative treated samples. Different letters (a, b) are significantly different (P < 0.05) for the same treatment group among difference time, different letters (A, B) are significantly different (P < 0.05) for the same time; Values were presented as means ± standard deviation (n = 3).](/cms/asset/53f3d1b1-a6c6-4276-8d0a-55c6f175d550/ljfp_a_1505754_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. Effects of in-vitro protein oxidization on gel hardness (A) and WHC (B) of heat-induced gel during 28 days refrigeration. Note: Control, without oxidative treated samples; Oxidized, pre-oxidative treated samples. Different letters (a, b) are significantly different (P < 0.05) for the same treatment group among difference time, different letters (A, B) are significantly different (P < 0.05) for the same time; Values were presented as means ± standard deviation (n = 3).
![Figure 2. Effects of in-vitro protein oxidization on gel hardness (A) and WHC (B) of heat-induced gel during 28 days refrigeration. Note: Control, without oxidative treated samples; Oxidized, pre-oxidative treated samples. Different letters (a, b) are significantly different (P < 0.05) for the same treatment group among difference time, different letters (A, B) are significantly different (P < 0.05) for the same time; Values were presented as means ± standard deviation (n = 3).](/cms/asset/e1d54cda-b4da-4a41-88f7-bc57a37d0708/ljfp_a_1505754_f0002_b.gif)
Figure 3. SEM microstructure of heat-induced protein gel subjected to in-vitro protein oxidation during 28 days refrigeration. Note: 0–4 were 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days, respectively. C was the scanning electron micrograph of Control samples, T was the scanning electron micrograph of oxidization samples.
![Figure 3. SEM microstructure of heat-induced protein gel subjected to in-vitro protein oxidation during 28 days refrigeration. Note: 0–4 were 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days, respectively. C was the scanning electron micrograph of Control samples, T was the scanning electron micrograph of oxidization samples.](/cms/asset/c5f21fc4-3663-461d-bdea-7e0f70c05dc8/ljfp_a_1505754_f0003_b.gif)
Figure 4. Effects of in-vitro protein oxidization on water distribution of chicken myofibrillar protein heat-induced gel (A: relaxation time; B: proportion of T22, C: proportion of T23) during 28 days refrigeration. Note: Control, without oxidative treated samples; Oxidized, pre-oxidative treated samples, Values were presented as means ± standard deviation (n = 3).
![Figure 4. Effects of in-vitro protein oxidization on water distribution of chicken myofibrillar protein heat-induced gel (A: relaxation time; B: proportion of T22, C: proportion of T23) during 28 days refrigeration. Note: Control, without oxidative treated samples; Oxidized, pre-oxidative treated samples, Values were presented as means ± standard deviation (n = 3).](/cms/asset/9f1c76c5-c987-4a45-9912-6376e039eef7/ljfp_a_1505754_f0004_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Effect of protein oxidization on stability of heat-induced gel water distribution T2.
Table 2. Correlation among variables in study of the effect of protein oxidization on heat-induced gel storage stability.