Figures & data
Figure 1. A generic ‘Hayward’ kiwifruit with the major geometrical attributes highlighted: = major axis;
= minor axis;
= length
![Figure 1. A generic ‘Hayward’ kiwifruit with the major geometrical attributes highlighted: DX = major axis; DY = minor axis; L = length](/cms/asset/e98409c6-fa41-4cca-9e40-7add176720f7/ljfp_a_1584631_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. Empirical shape profiles in the (a) X-Z, (b) Y-Z, and (c) X-Y directions for count 36 Hayward kiwifruit. Minimum (min), average (av) and maximum (max) profiles are the result of tracing the shape of 117 fruit.[Citation11] Images not to scale; scale omitted to preserve data confidentiality
![Figure 2. Empirical shape profiles in the (a) X-Z, (b) Y-Z, and (c) X-Y directions for count 36 Hayward kiwifruit. Minimum (min), average (av) and maximum (max) profiles are the result of tracing the shape of 117 fruit.[Citation11] Images not to scale; scale omitted to preserve data confidentiality](/cms/asset/fea73a73-9f3e-43ad-9f1a-ea75be5540ac/ljfp_a_1584631_f0002_b.gif)
Figure 3. Comparison of Longitudinal Profile Functions (LPFs) with empirical shape data for Hayward kiwifruit: Red = empirical shape data; blue = new LPF (EquationEquation 6(6)
(6) ); and cyan = an ellipsoid
![Figure 3. Comparison of Longitudinal Profile Functions (LPFs) with empirical shape data for Hayward kiwifruit: Red = empirical shape data; blue = new LPF (EquationEquation 6(6) f2=expZ−1(6) ); and cyan = an ellipsoid](/cms/asset/aee5806c-cc05-4bb1-8961-0ba286337451/ljfp_a_1584631_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. (a–d) Dimensionless empirical minimum, average and maximum shape profiles for count 36 Hayward kiwifruit (red) compared with the updated LPF (EquationEquation 9(9)
(9) ) where
= 7.0 (blue; EquationEquation (9)
(9)
(9) ); (e) Creating a kiwifruit in COMSOL as eight parametric surfaces
![Figure 4. (a–d) Dimensionless empirical minimum, average and maximum shape profiles for count 36 Hayward kiwifruit (red) compared with the updated LPF (EquationEquation 9(9) dj,k=Lk−LkexpS−1×expS×ZLk−12⋅Lk+Lk2−Z22⋅Lk×Dj(9) ) where S= 7.0 (blue; EquationEquation (9)(9) dj,k=Lk−LkexpS−1×expS×ZLk−12⋅Lk+Lk2−Z22⋅Lk×Dj(9) ); (e) Creating a kiwifruit in COMSOL as eight parametric surfaces](/cms/asset/0f73127d-c795-41d2-9f02-97fd9d01ed5f/ljfp_a_1584631_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. Numerical calculation of (a) volume and (b) surface area using the disk technique (Riddle, Citation1974)
![Figure 5. Numerical calculation of (a) volume and (b) surface area using the disk technique (Riddle, Citation1974)](/cms/asset/f4706ada-72c7-43d2-96b2-10e888294635/ljfp_a_1584631_f0005_oc.jpg)
Figure 6. Efficacy of using the disk method to numerically approximate the (a) volume and (b) surface area of a sphere (radius = 1 m) as a function of the degree of numerical discretization resolution
![Figure 6. Efficacy of using the disk method to numerically approximate the (a) volume and (b) surface area of a sphere (radius = 1 m) as a function of the degree of numerical discretization resolution](/cms/asset/5a446dbe-cf78-41fe-8e4b-97fa6b052bfc/ljfp_a_1584631_f0006_oc.jpg)
Figure 7. Comparison of predicted volumes using the new shape equation for kiwifruit (crosses; EquationEquation 9)(9)
(9) and ellipsoids (circles; EquationEquation 5)
(5)
(5) with measured volumes (dashed line) of kiwifruit ranging from 55.3 to 112.3 g.[Citation16]
![Figure 7. Comparison of predicted volumes using the new shape equation for kiwifruit (crosses; EquationEquation 9)(9) dj,k=Lk−LkexpS−1×expS×ZLk−12⋅Lk+Lk2−Z22⋅Lk×Dj(9) and ellipsoids (circles; EquationEquation 5)(5) dj,k=Lk2−Z2Lk×Dj(5) with measured volumes (dashed line) of kiwifruit ranging from 55.3 to 112.3 g.[Citation16]](/cms/asset/99fb5aca-30c4-46b5-9ada-a75c1f2b9365/ljfp_a_1584631_f0007_b.gif)