Figures & data
Figure 1. Second molar implant site in which the visibility score of the mandibular canal (arrow) was equal on both of orthoradial (a) and oblique slices (b).
![Figure 1. Second molar implant site in which the visibility score of the mandibular canal (arrow) was equal on both of orthoradial (a) and oblique slices (b).](/cms/asset/35843c3e-b80a-4a84-8ed0-63e88bdf4beb/tbeq_a_1166349_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. First molar implant site in which the visibility score of the mandibular canal (arrow) was more on orthoradial (a) than oblique slices (b).
![Figure 2. First molar implant site in which the visibility score of the mandibular canal (arrow) was more on orthoradial (a) than oblique slices (b).](/cms/asset/dceff0b5-eb4a-4ed7-9e9e-01fecac516df/tbeq_a_1166349_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. Second molar implant site in which the visibility score of the mandibular canal (arrow) was less on orthoradial (a) than oblique slices (b).
![Figure 3. Second molar implant site in which the visibility score of the mandibular canal (arrow) was less on orthoradial (a) than oblique slices (b).](/cms/asset/266a459b-095c-4f70-9424-c39b1513e443/tbeq_a_1166349_f0003_oc.jpg)
Table 1. The visibility scores of orthoradial and oblique CBCT slices according to location of implant site.