Advanced search
Publication Cover
Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment Volume 30, 2016 - Issue 4
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,013
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles; Medical Biotechnology

The visibility of mandibular canal on orthoradial and oblique CBCT slices at molar implant sites

Mustafa AlkhaderDepartment of Oral Surgery and Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, JordanCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Malik HudiebDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
,
Fadi JarabDepartment of Oral Surgery and Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
&
Ashraf ShaweeshDepartment of Oral Surgery and Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
Pages 770-776 | Received 30 Oct 2015, Accepted 12 Mar 2016, Published online: 04 Apr 2016

References

  • van Velzen FJ, Ofec R, Schulten EA, et al. 10-year survival rate and the incidence of peri-implant disease of 374 titanium dental implants with a SLA surface: a prospective cohort study in 177 fully and partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26:1121–7.
  • White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation. 7th ed. St. Louis (MO): Mosby Elsevier; 2014.
  • Mehra A, Pai KM. Evaluation of dimensional accuracy of panoramic cross-sectional tomography, its ability to identify the inferior alveolar canal, and its impact on estimation of appropriate implant dimensions in the mandibular posterior region. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14:100–7.
  • Jung YH, Cho BH. Radiographic evaluation of the course and visibility of the mandibular canal. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014;44:273–7.
  • de Oliveira-Santos C, Souza PH, de Azambuja Berti-Couto S, et al. Assessment of variations of the mandibular canal through cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16:387–7.
  • Liang X, Jacobs R, Hassan B, et al. A comparative evaluation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT). Part I. On subjective image quality. Eur J Radiol. 2010;75:265–7.
  • Naitoh M, Nakahara K, Suenaga Y, et al. Comparison between cone-beam and multislice computed tomography depicting mandibular neurovascular canal structures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109:25–7.
  • Angelopoulos C, Thomas SL, Hechler S, et al. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:2130–7.
  • Gerlach NL, Meijer GJ, Maal TJ, et al. Reproducibility of 3 different tracing methods based on cone beam computed tomography in determining the anatomical position of the mandibular canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:811–7.
  • Kamrun N, Tetsumura A, Nomura Y, et al. Visualization of the superior and inferior borders of the mandibular canal: a comparative study using digital panoramic radiographs and cross-sectional computed tomography images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;115:550–7.
  • Naitoh M, Katsumata A, Kubota Y, et al. The role of objective plane angulation on the mandibular image using cross-sectional tomography. J Oral Implantol. 2006;32:117–7.
  • Oliveira-Santos C, Capelozza AL, Dezzoti MS, et al. Visibility of the mandibular canal on CBCT cross-sectional images. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19:240–7.
  • Shokri A, Shakibaei Z, Langaroodi AJ, et al. Evaluation of the mandibular canal visibility on cone-beam computed tomography images of the mandible. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25:273–7.
  • Lofthag-Hansen S, Gröndahl K, Ekestubbe A. Cone-beam CT for preoperative implant planning in the posterior mandible: visibility of anatomic landmarks. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009;11:246–7.
  • Takahashi A, Watanabe H, Kamiyama Y, et al. Localizing the mandibular canal on dental CT reformatted images: usefulness of panoramic views. Surg Radiol Anat. 2013;35:803–7.
  • Machtei EE, Oettinger-Barak O, Horwitz J. Axial relationship between dental implants and teeth/implants: a radiographic study. J Oral Implantol. 2014;40:425–7.
  • DE Vico G, Bonino M, Spinelli D, et al. Rationale for tilted implants: FEA considerations and clinical reports. Oral Implantol (Rome). 2011;4:23–7.
  • Krekmanov L, Kahn M, Rangert B, et al. Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:405–7.
  • Pancko F, Dyer J, Weisglass S, et al. Use of tilted implants in treatment of the atrophic posterior mandible: a preliminary report of a novel approach. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:407–7.
  • Neves FS, Vasconcelos TV, Oenning AC, et al. Oblique or orthoradial CBCT slices for preoperative implant planning: which one is more accurate? Braz J Oral Sci. 2014;13:104–7.
  • Nelson S, Ash MM. Wheeler's dental anatomy, physiology and occlusion. 9th ed. St. Louis (MO): Saunders Elsevier; 2009.
  • Tyndall DA, Price JB, Tetradis S, et al. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;113:817–7.
  • Gowgiel JM. The position and course of the mandibular canal. J Oral Implantol. 1992;18:383–7.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.