Figures & data
Figure 1. Workflow summary of the analysis approaches implemented in this study. TFBS, transcription factor binding sites; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphisms.
![Figure 1. Workflow summary of the analysis approaches implemented in this study. TFBS, transcription factor binding sites; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphisms.](/cms/asset/024be6a6-5e78-41fe-b40e-5fbc612dbac9/tbeq_a_2081516_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. Venn diagram (A) illustrates the up-regulated DEGs determined between the TD1 and TD2, Venn diagram (B) illustrates the down-regulated DEGs determined between the TD1 and TD2; and (C) the expression levels of up- and down-regulated sDEGs in TD2 compared to TD1.
![Figure 2. Venn diagram (A) illustrates the up-regulated DEGs determined between the TD1 and TD2, Venn diagram (B) illustrates the down-regulated DEGs determined between the TD1 and TD2; and (C) the expression levels of up- and down-regulated sDEGs in TD2 compared to TD1.](/cms/asset/99c11aea-3773-40a8-ae47-0d1578145595/tbeq_a_2081516_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 1. Six SNPs identified within the 4 sDEGs and their allele, chromosomal position, gene name and description.
Figure 3. Discovered motifs and their p- and E-values as identified by MEME web server within the upstream regions of all MIOX-1 orthologous genes.
![Figure 3. Discovered motifs and their p- and E-values as identified by MEME web server within the upstream regions of all MIOX-1 orthologous genes.](/cms/asset/682c8184-3d75-4da5-ac17-3f9193f39ded/tbeq_a_2081516_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4. Motif comparison analysis shows the targeted SNP located at position five and its matching with the WRKY transcription factor 1 binding site.
![Figure 4. Motif comparison analysis shows the targeted SNP located at position five and its matching with the WRKY transcription factor 1 binding site.](/cms/asset/8e45b795-004f-4569-bf67-9621e789f573/tbeq_a_2081516_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5. Heatmap represents the comparative expression levels results of the MIOX1 and WRKY1 genes between the QM6 cultivar (tolerant) and CS cultivar (sensitive) at four different timepoints.
![Figure 5. Heatmap represents the comparative expression levels results of the MIOX1 and WRKY1 genes between the QM6 cultivar (tolerant) and CS cultivar (sensitive) at four different timepoints.](/cms/asset/2578015a-f29e-44db-ae4a-37e528b9d687/tbeq_a_2081516_f0005_c.jpg)
Supplemental Material
Download Zip (209.4 KB)Data availability statement
The authors agree to make data and materials supporting the results or analyses presented in their paper available upon reasonable request.