Figures & data
Figure 1. Relative union membership rates by gender in 14 countries. Own elaboration. Data: ESS (Citation2018).
![Figure 1. Relative union membership rates by gender in 14 countries. Own elaboration. Data: ESS (Citation2018).](/cms/asset/336b5449-c294-4a01-92de-624a61ef974a/rjpp_a_2184414_f0001_ob.jpg)
Table 1. Centralization, routine involvement in policy-making and female-to-male membership ratios by country (N = 20) and welfare cluster across different periods (Visser, Citation2019).
Figure 2. Cartesian graph mapping countries according to leaves generosity and female-to-male union density odds ratio (pooled averages 1980–2010). Black solid lines represent median values. Different dots indicate welfare regime families (Nordic; Liberal; Continental; Mediterranean).
![Figure 2. Cartesian graph mapping countries according to leaves generosity and female-to-male union density odds ratio (pooled averages 1980–2010). Black solid lines represent median values. Different dots indicate welfare regime families (Nordic; Liberal; Continental; Mediterranean).](/cms/asset/c7de79c4-3e1a-432e-9e31-1f175aea1be0/rjpp_a_2184414_f0002_ob.jpg)
Figure 3. Scatterplots of countries’ leaves generosity and female/male union density ratios in different corporatist contexts (‘low’ vs. ‘high’ levels of routine involvement of trade unions in policy-making; pooled averages 1980-2010). Black solid lines indicate the best fit using OLS. ‘High’: above the median value of ‘routine involvement in policy-making’; ‘low’: below median.
![Figure 3. Scatterplots of countries’ leaves generosity and female/male union density ratios in different corporatist contexts (‘low’ vs. ‘high’ levels of routine involvement of trade unions in policy-making; pooled averages 1980-2010). Black solid lines indicate the best fit using OLS. ‘High’: above the median value of ‘routine involvement in policy-making’; ‘low’: below median.](/cms/asset/4295de7d-a1b9-44b2-b8b3-802d759f039f/rjpp_a_2184414_f0003_ob.jpg)
Figure 4. Scatterplot of leaves generosity and union centralization (pooled averages 1980–2010). The black solid line indicates the best fit using OLS.
![Figure 4. Scatterplot of leaves generosity and union centralization (pooled averages 1980–2010). The black solid line indicates the best fit using OLS.](/cms/asset/aa788982-5102-41ea-99dc-c7bf5e1cdbed/rjpp_a_2184414_f0004_ob.jpg)
Table 2. Regression results from fixed-effects designs, including lagged dependent variables and country-clustered robust standard errors (in parentheses).