Bread or roses? Trade unions, female employment and the expansion of work-family policies

References

• Armingeon, K., Engler, S., & Leemann, L. (2021). Comparative political data Set 1960-2019. Institute of Political Science, University of Zurich.
   Google Scholar
• Beramendi, P., Häusermann, S., Kitschelt, H., & Kriesi, H. (2015). Introduction: The politics of advanced capitalism. In P. Beramendi, S. Häusermann, H. Kitschelt, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The politics of advanced capitalism (Vol. C, pp. 1–66). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, S. D. (1983). Organizing interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, corporatism, and the transformation of politics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergholm, T., & Sippola, M. (2022). The restructuring of Finnish trade unions – the growing importance of women. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 12(S8), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.129504
   Google Scholar
• Bledow, N. (2021). Labor unions in the contemporary welfare state: Preferences, Salience, Positions.
   Google Scholar
• Bledow, N., & Busemeyer, M. R. (2021). Lukewarm or enthusiastic supporters? Exploring union member attitudes towards social investment and compensatory policy. Journal of European Social Policy, 31(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928720974182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonoli, G. (2005). The politics of the new social policies: Providing coverage against new social risks in mature welfare states. Policy & Politics, 33(3), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1332/0305573054325765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonoli, G., & Natali, D. (2012). The politics of the new welfare state. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, D., Huber, E., & Stephens, J. D. (2020). Comparative welfare states data Set. University of North Carolina and WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
   Google Scholar
• Cigna, L. M. (2022). Looking for a north star? Ideological justifications and trade unions’ preferences for a universal basic income. European Journal of Industrial Relations 28(2), 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/09596801211043094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, D., & van Wijnbergen, C. (2011). Welfare institutions and the mobilization of consent: Union responses to labour market activation policies in France and The Netherlands. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 17(4), 333–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680111424661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. (2000). The snakes and ladders of twenty-first-century trade unionism. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 16(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/16.1.70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, M., & Ferragina, E. (2018). Family policy in high-income countries: Five decades of development. Journal of European Social Policy, 28(3), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928717735060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doellgast, V., Lillie, N., & Pulignano, V. (2018). Reconstructing solidarity: Labour unions, precarious work, and the politics of institutional change in Europe. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durazzi, N., & Geyer, L. (2022). Social (investment) partners? Trade unions’ social investment policy preferences and their role in the politics of social investment in Europe. In J. Garritzmann, S. Häusermann, & B. Palier (Eds.), The world politics of social investment (issue 1) (pp. 307–329). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emmenegger, P., Häusermann, S., Palier, B., & Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2012). The age of dualization: The changing face of inequality in deindustrializing societies. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ESS Round 9: European Social Survey Round 9 Data (2018). Data file edition 3.1. Sikt - Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research, Norway – Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.
   Google Scholar
• Ferragina, E., & Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2015). Determinants of a silent (R)evolution: Understanding the expansion of family policy in rich OECD countries. Social Politics, 22(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxu027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanders, A. (1970). Management and unions: The theory and reform of industrial relations. Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Fleckenstein, T., & Lee, S. C. (2014). The politics of postindustrial social policy: Family policy reforms in Britain, Germany, South Korea, and Sweden. Comparative Political Studies, 47(4), 601–630. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012451564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleckenstein, T., & Lee, S. C. (2020). Roads and barriers towards social investments: Comparing labour market and family policy reforms in Europe and east Asia. Policy and Society, 39(2), 266–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2019.1688617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleckenstein, T., & Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2011). Business, skills and the welfare state: The political economy of employment-oriented family policy in Britain and Germany. Journal of European Social Policy, 21(2), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928710380483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier, A. H. (2011). Comparative family policy database, version 3 [computer file]. Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute and Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (Distributors).
   Google Scholar
• Gingrich, J., & Häusermann, S. (2015). The decline of the working-class vote, the reconfiguration of the welfare support coalition and consequences for the welfare state. Journal of European Social Policy, 25(1), 50–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928714556970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, J. C. (2015). Protecting the unemployed: Varieties of unionism and the evolution of unemployment benefits and active labor market policy in the rich democracies. Socio-Economic Review, 13(1), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwu029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumbrell-McCormick, R., & Hyman, R. (2013). Trade unions in Western Europe: Hard times, hard choices. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassel, A. (2015). Trade unions and the future of democratic capitalism. In P. Beramendi, S. Häusermann, H. Kitschelt, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The politics of advanced capitalism (pp. 231–256). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Häusermann, S. (2010). Solidarity with whom? Why organised labour is losing ground in continental pension politics. European Journal of Political Research, 49(2), 223–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01896.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häusermann, S. (2018). The multidimensional politics of social investment in conservative welfare regimes: Family policy reform between social transfers and social investment. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(6), 862–877. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1401106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häusermann, S., & Palier, B. (2017). The politics of social investment. In A. Hemerijck (Ed.), The uses of social investment (pp. 339–348). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hemerijck, A. (2013). Changing welfare states. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hemerijck, A. (2017). The uses of social investment. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M., & Oser, J. (2016). Trade union density and social expenditure: A longitudinal analysis of policy feedback effects in OECD countries, 1980–2010. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(10), 1520–1542. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1102952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, E., & Stephens, J. D. (2001). Development and crisis of the welfare state. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyman, R. (2001). Understanding European Trade Unionism: Between market, Class and Society. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hyman, R. (2007). How can trade unions act strategically? Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 13(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/102425890701300204
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2000). The developmental theory of the gender gap: Women’s and men’s voting behavior in global perspective. International Political Science Review, 21(4), 441–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512100214007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen, T., & Rosenbluth, F. (2006). The political economy of gender: Explaining cross-national variation in the gender division of labor and the gender voting gap. American Journal of Political Science, 50(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00166.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M. (2011). Governing for the long term. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, A., Kornelakis, A., & D’acri, C. R. (2012). Swords of justice in an age of retrenchment? The role of trade unions in welfare provision. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 18(2), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258912439148
   Google Scholar
• Korpi, W. (1983). The democratic class struggle. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Korpi, W. (2006). Power resources and employer-centered approaches in explanations of welfare states and varieties of capitalism: Protagonists, consenters, and antagonists. World Politics, 58(2), 167–206. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2006.0026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, P. A. (2008). The comparative political economy of parental leave and child care: Evidence from twenty OECD countries. Social Politics, 15(3), 315–344. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxn013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lembruch, G. (1984). Concertation and the structure of corporatist networks. In J. Goldthorpe (Ed.), Order and conflict in contemporary capitalism (pp. 60–80). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lesthaeghe, R. (2014). The second demographic transition: A concise overview of its development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(51), 18112–18115. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1420441111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. J. (2013). Path shifting of the welfare state: Electoral competition and the expansion of work-family policies in Western Europe. World Politics, 65(1), 73–115. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887112000251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, A. (1999). Women, work and trade unions. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Naczyk, M., & Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2015). Solidarity against all odds: Trade unions and the privatization of pensions in the age of dualization. Politics and Society, 43(3), 361–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329215584789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2021). OECD statistics.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, AIAS (2021). Institutional characteristics of trade unions, wage setting, state intervention and social pacts. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Oesch, D. (2006). Redrawing the class map. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Offe, C., & Wiesenthal, H. (1985). The two logics of collective action. Political Power and Social Theory, 1, 67–115.
   Google Scholar
• Ornston, D. (2013). Creative corporatism: The politics of high-technology competition in nordic Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 46(6), 702–729. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012463881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palier, B., & Thelen, K. (2010). Institutionalizing dualism: Complementarities and change in France and Germany. Politics & Society, 38(1), 119–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329209357888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizzorno, A. (1978). Political exchange and collective identity in industrial conflict. In C. Crouch & A. Pizzorno (Eds.), The resurgence of class conflict in Western Europe since 1968 (pp. 277–298). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Plavgo, I., & Hemerijck, A. (2021). The social investment litmus test: Family formation, employment and poverty. Journal of European Social Policy, 31(3), 282–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928720950627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulignano, V., Ortíz Gervasi, L., & de Franceschi, F. (2016). Union responses to precarious workers: Italy and Spain compared. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 22(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680115621410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qvist, G. (1980). Policy towards women and the women’s struggle in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of History, 5(1-4), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/03468758008578966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathgeb, P. (2018). Strong governments, precarious workers. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rehm, P. (2011). Social policy by popular demand. World Politics, 63(2), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887111000037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueda, D. (2007). Social democracy inside out: Partisanship and labor market policy in advanced industrialized democracies. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rueda, D., Wibbels, E., & Altamirano, M. (2015). The origins of dualism. In P. Beramendi, S. Hausermann, H. Kitschelt, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The politics of advanced capitalism (pp. 89–111). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saraceno, C. (2018). Family policies. In B. Greve (Ed.), Routledge handbook of the welfare state (pp. 443–456). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games real actors play. Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P. C. (1974). Still the century of corporatism? The Review of Politics, 36(1), 85–131. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500022178
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P., & Streeck, W. (1999). The organization of business interests: Studying the associative action of business in advanced industrial societies. (MPIfG Discussion Paper, Vol. 99, Issue 1).
   Google Scholar
• Schnabel, C. (2013). Union membership and density: Some (not so) stylized facts and challenges. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 19(3), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680113493373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwander, H., & Häusermann, S. (2013). Who is in and who is out? A risk-based conceptualization of insiders and outsiders. Journal of European Social Policy, 23(3), 248–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928713480064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2016). The end of the conservative German welfare state model. Social Policy & Administration, 50(2), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skorge, ØS, & Rasmussen, M. B. (2022). Volte-face on the welfare state: Social partners, knowledge economies, and the expansion of work-family policies. Politics & Society, 50(2), 222–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323292211014371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swank, D. (2020). The partisan politics of new social risks in advanced postindustrial democracies: Social protection for labor market outsiders. In R. Careja, P. Emmenegger, & N. Giger (Eds.), The European social model under pressure (pp. 139–157). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Swenson, P. A. (2003). Capitalists against markets. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tassinari, A., Donaghey, J., & Galetto, M. (2022). Puzzling choices in hard times: Union ideologies of social concertation in the great recession. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 61(1), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. (2014). Varieties of liberalization and the new politics of social solidarity. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsarouhas, D. (2011). Frame extension, trade union identities, and wage politics: Evidence from Sweden. Social Politics, 18(3), 419–440. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxr017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, J. (2019). Can unions revitalize themselves? International Journal of Labour Research, 9(1-2), 17–48.
   Google Scholar