5,596
Views
43
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Reframing the future: the role of reflexivity in governance networks in sustainability transitions

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 1383-1405 | Received 02 Jun 2017, Accepted 30 Oct 2017, Published online: 30 Nov 2017

Figures & data

Figure 1. Analytical framework: relations between the concepts.

Figure 1. Analytical framework: relations between the concepts.

Table 1. An overview of methods used for each network in 2014–2016.

Matrix 1. Three project examples of the Utrecht network.

Figure 2. Dynamics of reflexivity, trust, commitment and reframing in the Utrecht network (h = high, m = medium, l = low,

 = significant change).

Figure 2. Dynamics of reflexivity, trust, commitment and reframing in the Utrecht network (h = high, m = medium, l = low, Display full size = significant change).

Matrix 2. Three project examples of the Flevoland network.

Figure 3. Reflexivity, trust, commitment and reframing and in the Flevoland network (h = high, m = medium, l = low,

 = significant change).

Figure 3. Reflexivity, trust, commitment and reframing and in the Flevoland network (h = high, m = medium, l = low, Display full size = significant change).

Matrix 3. Three project examples of the Limburg network.

Figure 4. Reflexivity, trust, commitment and reframing in the Limburg network (h = high, m = medium, l =low,

 = significant change).

Figure 4. Reflexivity, trust, commitment and reframing in the Limburg network (h = high, m = medium, l =low, Display full size = significant change).