Figures & data
Table 1. An overview of methods used for each network in 2014–2016.
Matrix 1. Three project examples of the Utrecht network.
Figure 2. Dynamics of reflexivity, trust, commitment and reframing in the Utrecht network (h = high, m = medium, l = low,
![Figure 2. Dynamics of reflexivity, trust, commitment and reframing in the Utrecht network (h = high, m = medium, l = low, Display full size = significant change).](/cms/asset/35cf677e-ec08-46d4-bb14-3e242e6f51e7/ceer_a_1402171_f0002_oc.gif)
Matrix 2. Three project examples of the Flevoland network.
Figure 3. Reflexivity, trust, commitment and reframing and in the Flevoland network (h = high, m = medium, l = low,
![Figure 3. Reflexivity, trust, commitment and reframing and in the Flevoland network (h = high, m = medium, l = low, Display full size = significant change).](/cms/asset/304cd6e3-430d-4760-a156-ae0c6bdac9dd/ceer_a_1402171_f0003_oc.gif)