Potential conflicts between ownership rights and environmental protection: Swedish undergraduate students’ views

Figures & data

Table 1. Percentage distribution regarding themes in each category at T1 and T2 (N = 747).

First–third person	36	41	Land	40	46	Draw	15	15
One	14	16	Forest	8	8	Owner	16	16
Corporate	3	3	Real estate	6	7	Environment	31	29
Collective	1	0	Physical object	8	4	Not applicable	22	31
Not applicable	31	31	Not applicable	23	26	Missing value	16	9
Missing value	15	9	Missing value	15	9		100	100
Total	100	100		100	100

Table 2. How do students of law, economy and political science formulate a conceived conflict between ownership rights and environmental protection?

	Economics	Law	Political science	Total
	T1 = 252	T2 = 273	T1 N = 210	T2 = 235	T1 = 168	T2 = 173	T1 = 630	T2 = 681
Subject 1st–3rd  ‘One’  Corporate  Collective  NA	39.7	44.3	39.3	48.5	51.8	41.6	43.0	45.1
	16.7	21.2	20.4	14.0	10.1	16.8	16.5	17.6
	3.6	3.3	4.3	1.7	4.2	6.4	4.0	3.5
	0.8	0.4	0.9	0	0	0	0.6	0.1
	39.3	30.8	35.1	35.7	33.9	35.3	35.9	33.6
Object Land  Forest  Real Est.  Ph. Object  NA	51.6	49.5	41.7	47.7	48.2	56.1	47.6	50.5
	6.7	12.5	7.1	5.5	14.3	9.2	8.9	9.3
	3.5	7.0	10.0	7.2	8.3	8.1	7.0	7.3
	7.5	1.8	13.7	6.8	5.4	5.8	9.0	4.6
	30.7	29.3	27.5	32.8	23.8	20.8	27.5	23.8
Balance Draw	18.2	16.8	16.3	20.4	17.9	12.1	17.5	16.9
Owner loser	17.4	13.6	23.0	23.4	15.5	17.9	18.7	18.1
Env. loser	32.4	37.0	35.9	22.1	44.6	36.4	36.8	31.7
NA	32.0	32.6	24.9	34.0	22.0	33.5	27.0	33.0

Percentage distribution of themes emerging in the students’ answers. Missing values have been reduced.