Potential conflicts between ownership rights and environmental protection: Swedish undergraduate students’ views

References

• Bluffstone, R. 2007. “Privatization and Contaminated Site Remediation in Central and Eastern Europe: Do Environmental Liability Policies Matter?” Ecological Economics 63(1): 31–41. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capra, F., and U. Mattei. 2015. The Ecology of Law: Toward a Legal System in Tune with Nature and Community. Broadway Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., and J. Bransford. 2005. Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and Be Able to Do. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Demsetz, H. 2000. “Toward a Theory of Property Rights.” In Classic Papers in Natural Resource Economics, edited by C. Gopalakrishnan, 163–177. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Elgåker, H., S. Pinzke, C. Nilsson, and G. Lindholm. 2012. “Horse Riding Posing Challenges to the Swedish Right of Public Access.” Land Use Policy 29: 274–293. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fay, D., and D. James. 2009. The Rights and Wrongs of Land Restitution: ‘Restoring What Was Ours’. Cavendish: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1975. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, B. D., and J. M. Hudak. 2017. “Comparison of the Role of Property Rights in Right Wing and Left Wing American and European Environmental Policy Deliberations.” Environmental Science & Policy 68: 28–34. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.11.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. 1968. “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science 162: 1243–1248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harring, N., and C. Lundholm. 2018. “Does Knowledge About Social Dilemmas Generate Cynical Citizens?” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Boston, USA, August 30–September 2.
   Google Scholar
• Holsti, O. R. 1969. Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. London: Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Ignell, C., P. Davies, and C. Lundholm. 2019. “A Longitudinal Study of Upper Secondary School Students’ Values and Beliefs Regarding Policy Responses to Climate Change.” Environmental Education Research 25(5), 615-632 doi:10.1080/13504622.2018.1523369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagers, S. C., N. Harring, Å. LöFgren, M. SjöStedt, F. Alpizar, B. BrüLde, D. Langlet, et al. 2019. “On the Preconditions for Large-Scale Collective Action,” The Centre for Collective Action Research Working Paper Series, WP 2019:1, University of Gothenburg. https://cecar.gu.se/digitalAssets/1719/1719495_1717752_cecar-wp1-final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kashwan, P. 2016. “What Explains the Demand for Collective Forest Rights Amidst Land Use Conflicts?” Journal of Environmental Management 183: 657–666. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelle, U. 2006. “Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Research Practice: Purposes and Advantages.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(4): 293–311. doi:10.1177/1478088706070839..
   Google Scholar
• Kollmuss, A., and J. Agyeman. 2002. “Mind the Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What Are the Bariers to Pro-Environmental Behaviour?” Environmental Education Research 8(3): 239–260. doi:10.1080/13504620220145401.
   Google Scholar
• La Mela, M. 2014. “Property Rights in Conflict: Wild Berry-Picking and the Nordic Tradition of Allemansratt.” Scandinavian Economic History Review 62(3): 266–289. http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/sehr20. doi:10.1080/03585522.2013.876928.
   Google Scholar
• Laessöe, J., N. W. Feinstein, and N. Blum. 2013. “Environmental Education Policy Research–Challenges and Ways Research Might Cope With Them.” Environmental Education Research 19(2): 231–242. doi:10.1080/13504622.2013.778230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, S., F. Leone, and C. Zoppi. 2017. “Land Cover Changes and Environmental Protection: A Study Based on Transition Matrices Concerning Sardinia (Italy).” Land Use Policy 67(Supplement C): 126–150. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.030.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, M., and I. Scoones. 2015. “Carbon Conflicts and Forest Landscapes in Africa.” London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lundegard, I., and P.-O. Wickman. 2007. “Conflicts of Interest: An Indispensable Element of Education for Sustainable Development.” Environmental Education Research 13(1): 1–15. doi:10.1080/13504620601122566.
   Google Scholar
• Lundholm, C. 2011. “Society’s Response to Environmental Challenges: Citizenship and the Role of Knowledge.” In Factis Pax 5: 80–96.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popping, R. 2015. “Analyzing Open-Ended Questions by Means of Text Analysis Procedures.” Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique Sociologique 128(1): 23. doi:10.1177/0759106315597389.
   Google Scholar
• Reja, U., K. Manfreda, V. Hlebec, and V. Vehovar. 2003. “Open-Ended vs. Close-Ended Questions in Web Questionnaires.” Adv Methodol Stats. 19. Retrieved from: https://www.stat-d.si/mz/mz19/reja.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rockström, J., W. Steffen, K. Noone, Å. Persson, S. I. Chapin, E. Lambin, and J. Oley. 2009. “Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity.” Ecology and Society 14(2): 1–33. doi:10.5751/ES-03180-140232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheba, A., and O. S. Rakotonarivo. 2016. “Territorialising REDD+: Conflicts Over Market-Based Forest Conservation in Lindi, Tanzania.” Land Use Policy 57: 625–637. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz, E., and C. Zuell. 2012. “Item Non-Response in Open-Ended Questions: Who Does Not Answer on the Meaning of Left and Right?” Social Science Research 41: 1415–1428. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.07.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepardson, D. P., D. Niyogi, A. Roychoudhury, and A. Hirsch. 2012. “Conceptualizing Climate Change in the Context of a Climate System: Implications for Climate and Environmental Education.” Environmental Education Research 18(3): 323–352. doi:10.1080/13504622.2011.622839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J., F. Pratto, M. Martin, and L. M. Stallworth. 1991. “Consensual Racism and Career Track: Some Implications of Social Dominance Theory.” Political Psychology 12(4): 691–721. doi:10.2307/3791552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikor, T., and T. N. Thanh. 2007. “Exclusive Versus Inclusive Devolution in Forest Management: Insights from Forest Land Allocation in Vietnam's Central Highlands.” Land Use Policy 24: 644–653. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sills, E. O., Atmadja, S. de Sassi, C. Duchelle, A. Kweka, E. Resosudarmo, D. I. Sunderlin, and W. D. 2014. REDD + on the Ground: A Case Book of Subnational Initiatives across the Globe. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Sténs, A., and C. Sandström. 2013. “Divergent Interests and Ideas Around Property Rights: The Case of Berry Harvesting in Sweden.” Forest Policy and Economics 33: 56–62. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2012.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. 2000. “New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior.” Journal of Social Issues 56(3): 407–424. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternäng, L., and C. Lundholm. 2012. “Climate Change and Costs: Investigating Students' Reasoning on Nature and Economic Development.” Environmental Education Research 18(3): 417–436. doi:10.1080/13504622.2011.630532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN. 2017. “UN-REDD Programme.” http://www.un-redd.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Vecchione, M., S. Schwartz, G. V. Caprara, H. Schoen, J. Cieciuch, J. Silvester, and G. Lessandri. 2015. “Personal Values and Political Activism: A Cross-National Study.” British Journal of Psychology 106(1): 84–106. doi:10.1111/bjop.12067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., C. McDermott, M. J. Vijge, and B. Cashore. 2012. “Trade-Offs, Co-Benefits and Safeguards: Current Debates on the Breadth of REDD+.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4: 646–653. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, G. 2015. Property and Environmental Protection in Europe. Europa Law Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Young, J., A. Watt, P. Nowicki, D. Alard, J. Clitherow, K. Henle, and C. Ichards. 2005. “Towards Sustainable Land Use: Identifying and Managing the Conflicts Between Human Activities and Biodiversity Conservation in Europe.” Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 1641–1661. doi:10.1007/s10531-004-0536-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuell, C., N. Menold, and S. Körber. 2015. “The Influence of the Answer Box Size on Item Nonresponse to Open-Ended Questions in a Web Survey.” Social Science Computer Review 33(1): 115. doi:10.1177/0894439314528091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar