Abstract
Locus of Control (LOC) is a general term used in social and educational psychology to refer to the perceived source of control for behavioural outcomes. Since the 1980s, various instruments have been developed to measure this construct in relation to pro-environmental behaviours and action. In this article, we revisit the value of this construct and its measurement to offer a critical analysis of the psychometric properties and instrument construction approach of eight publicly available Environmental Locus of Control (ELOC) instruments. Our analysis focuses on both the robustness of their instrumentation alongside the continued relevance of these measures to diverse audiences in light of various methodological advances. Findings suggest that while the theories and tools available for developing and validating ELOC have become more sophisticated, even the most recent ELOC instruments still exhibit key limitations, particularly in relation to content and construct validity. In light of this, we propose a series of considerations for developing more rigorous ELOC instruments to help improve future measurement of action and self-determined behaviour.
Acknowledgements
This review was made possible by a Monash International Postgraduate Research Scholarship and Monash Graduate Scholarship to the lead author. The authors wish to thank Dr. John Roodenburg and Dr Sarah Hopkins for their insightful feedback on an earlier version of this work.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Notes
1 Some studies (e.g., Chao Citation2012; Cincera and Simonova Citation2017; Yang et al. Citation2017) have measured locus of control as part of their studies in other languages but their research focus was not on thorough development and validation of ELOC measurements.