Identity disclosure between donor families and organ transplant recipients: an integrative review of the international literature

ABSTRACT

Anonymity of deceased organ donation is a legal requirement in many international jurisdictions where legislation prohibits health professionals from disclosing identifiable information about donors, recipients or their families. Written correspondence between donor families and transplant recipients that is coordinated by healthcare professionals must remain anonymous. Internationally, an increasing number of donor families and transplant recipients have advocated for law reform and policy amendment to enable the exchange of identifiable written correspondence and/or face-to-face meetings. This paper aims to synthesise and critically evaluate published, peer-reviewed literature on the perceptions, benefits and challenges of identifiable communication or anonymity between donor families and organ transplant recipients in the international context. Analysis of the findings revealed two major themes: (1) views held by donor families, transplant recipients and healthcare professionals towards identity disclosure in the context of organ donation are diverse across and within groups (2) there are benefits and burdens associated with connecting donor families and transplant recipients through written correspondence. Less is known about the impact of face-to-face meetings between donor families and transplant recipients. However, what is known is that for some donor families, meeting with the transplant recipient(s) may provide a range of positive emotions.

KEYWORDS:

• Donor family
• transplant recipient
• contact
• direct contact
• organ donation

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Author contribution

Please refer to separate document. Manuscript anonymised for peer review.

Data availability

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Ethics approval statement

Not applicable for this article.

Patient consent statement

Not applicable for this article.

Permission to reproduce material from other sources

Not applicable for this article.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.