0
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Does formal teacher competence matter for students’ mathematics achievement? Results from Swedish TIMSS 2019

, ORCID Icon &
Received 03 Jan 2023, Accepted 08 Jun 2024, Published online: 02 Jul 2024

Figures & data

Table 1. Teacher education categories in primary school 1972 – today.

Table 2. Demographics of participating teachers in TIMSS 2019.

Figure 1. Specialization for teaching primary mathematics.

Figure 1. Specialization for teaching primary mathematics.

Table 3. Frequencies of professional development in the past two years.

Table 4. Level of formal education completed.

Table 5. Descriptive statistics of Lang, Books, and Math_ach.

Table 6. Descriptive statistics of parent’s reported student skills before starting primary school.

Figure 2. Measurement model of latent mathematics teacher competence on between level.

Note: Coefficients are significant at p < .001.

Figure 2. Measurement model of latent mathematics teacher competence on between level.Note: Coefficients are significant at p < .001.

Figure 3. Relations between mathematics teacher competence for primary school and student achievement.

Note: The relations between mathematics teacher competence for primary school and student achievement, controlled for student SES and immigrant background/classroom composition at the individual/classroom level.

Figure 3. Relations between mathematics teacher competence for primary school and student achievement.Note: The relations between mathematics teacher competence for primary school and student achievement, controlled for student SES and immigrant background/classroom composition at the individual/classroom level.

Table 7. Means, standard deviations and correlations for dependent variable and independent variables at classroom level.

Table 8. Relationships between student mathematics achievement and formal teacher competence for primary school.