87
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Report

The influence of congenital corneal opacity on ERGs obtained using an abbreviated protocol

ORCID Icon, , , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 6-10 | Received 17 Jun 2022, Accepted 15 Nov 2022, Published online: 21 Dec 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Background

Visual electrophysiology may be used to assess visual potential in infants with congenital corneal opacities (CCO). It is essential to recognize confounding effects from these opacities on the flash electroretinogram (ERG).

Methods

ERGs were recorded in awake children employing skin electrodes placed at the lower eyelid crease, both referred to a midfrontal electrode (Fz). A hand-held stimulator was used to present a mixed rod-cone and a dim white stimulus. Recordings were carried out before and after penetrating keratoplasty (PK), when performed.

Results

Five infants under the age of 12 months with visually significant CCO were evaluated. In all cases, initial ERGs employing the mixed rod-cone stimulus showed well-defined a-wave with reduced amplitude b-wave. Reduction of stimulus intensity resulted in an increase in the b-wave and normalization of the b:a ratio from 1.1 (range 0.7 to 1.3) to 2.8 (range 1.5 to 4.3). In three cases who underwent PK, the postoperative ERGs recorded with a mixed rod-cone stimulus were normal in waveform shape with a mean b:a ratio of 2.0 (range 1.7 to 3.0).

Conclusion

Selective reduction of the scotopic bright flash ERG b-wave is typically caused by retinal dysfunction that is post-phototransduction or inner retinal. In infants with CCO, scotopic ERGs to bright flashes can show a reduced b:a ratio that improves or normalizes either after PK or stimulus intensity reduction. The study highlights that media opacity can contribute to the generation of an ERG with reduced b-wave in the absence of inner retinal dysfunction.

Author contributions

K.K.N. and A.L. designed the study; A.L. performed the electrophysiology tests; K.K.N. performed surgery; A.L., S.H., and H.S. collected the data; A.L. generated the figures; K.K.N., A.L., E.F., S.H., and H.S. drafted and revised the manuscript; and all approved the final manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are not publicly available because they contain information that could compromise the privacy of research participants but are available from K.K.N. upon reasonable request.

Statement of ethics

The study was conducted ethically in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. This study protocol was reviewed and approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board (approval number STUDY21070059).

Supplemental data

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/13816810.2022.2149817.

Additional information

Funding

P30 CORE award EY08098 from the National Eye Institute, NIH, and unrestricted supporting funds from The Research to Prevent Blindness Inc, NY, the Eye and Ear Foundation of Pittsburgh and the Children's Foundation.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 691.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.