The influence of congenital corneal opacity on ERGs obtained using an abbreviated protocol

References

• Vanathi M, Panda A, Vengayil S, Chaudhuri Z, Dada T. Pediatric keratoplasty. Surv Ophthalmol. 2009;54(2):245–71. doi:10.1016/J.SURVOPHTHAL.2008.12.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertle RW, Orlin SE. Successful visual rehabilitation after neonatal penetrating keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81(8):644–48. doi:10.1136/BJO.81.8.644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anstice NS, Thompson B. The measurement of visual acuity in children: an evidence-based update. Clin Exp Optom. 2014;97(1):3–11. doi:10.1111/cxo.12086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huurneman B, Boonstra FN.Assessment of near visual acuity in 0-13 year olds with normal and low vision: a systematic review. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016;16(1). doi:10.1186/s12886-016-0386-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burian HM, Burns CA. A note on senile cataracts and the electroretinogram. Documenta Ophthalmologica. 1966;20(1):141–49. doi:10.1007/BF00165412.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galloway NR. Electrophysiological testing of eyes with opaque media. Eye (Basingstoke). 1988;2(6):615–24. doi:10.1038/eye.1988.114.
   Google Scholar
• Thuangtong A, Samsen P, Ruangvaravate N, Supiyaphun C. Visual prognostic value of ocular electrophysiology tests in corneal transplantation. J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Apr;95(Suppl 4):S50–5.
   Google Scholar
• Mańkowski W, Wylȩgała A, Wylȩgała E. Assessment of visual evoked potentials in patients eligible for penetrating keratoplasty. Medicine (United States). 2018;97(9):e9861. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000009861.
   Google Scholar
• de Araujo AL, Charoenrook V, de la Paz MF, Temprano J, Barraquer RI, Michael R, de Araujo AL. The role of visual evoked potential and electroretinography in the preoperative assessment of osteo-keratoprosthesis or osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis surgery. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90(6):519–25. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.02086.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriss A, Russell-Eggitt I. Electrophysiological assessment of visual pathway function in infants. Eye (Lond). 1992;6(Pt 2):145–53. doi:10.1038/EYE.1992.30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marmoy OR, Moinuddin M, Thompson DA. An alternative electroretinography protocol for children: a study of diagnostic agreement and accuracy relative to ISCEV standard electroretinograms. Acta Ophthalmol. 2022;100:322–30. Published online 2021. doi:10.1111/AOS.14938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson DA, Lyons RJ, Liasis A, Russell-Eggitt I, Jägle H, Grünewald S. Retinal on-pathway deficit in congenital disorder of glycosylation due to phosphomannomutase deficiency. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130(6):712–19. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.130.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robson AG, Frishman LJ, Grigg J, Hamilton R, Jeffrey BG, Kondo M, Li S, Mcculloch DL. ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2022 update). Doc Ophthalmol. 2022;144(3):165–77. doi:10.1007/s10633-022-09872-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brecelj J. Visual electrophysiology in the clinical evaluation of optic neuritis, chiasmal tumours, achiasmia, and ocular albinism: an overview. Doc Ophthalmol. 2014;129(2):71–84. doi:10.1007/s10633-014-9448-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor MJ, McCulloch DL. Visual evoked potentials in infants and children. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1992;9(3):357–72. doi:10.1097/00004691-199207010-00004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriss A. Skin ERGs: their effectiveness in paediatric visual assessment, confounding factors, and comparison with ERGs recorded using various types of corneal electrode. Int J Psychophysiol. 1994;16(2–3):137–46. doi:10.1016/0167-8760(89)90040-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JM, Payne JF, Yan J, Barnes CS. Negative electroretinograms in the pediatric and adult population. Documenta Ophthalmologica. 2012;124(1):41–48. doi:10.1007/s10633-011-9301-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh AHC, Hogg CR, Holder GE. The incidence of negative ERG in clinical practice. Documenta Ophthalmologica. 2001;102(1):19–30. doi:10.1023/A:1017586118749.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricotti V, Jägle H, Theodorou M, Moore AT, Muntoni F, Thompson DA. Ocular and neurodevelopmental features of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a signature of dystrophin function in the central nervous system. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24(4):562–68. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch DL, Kondo M, Hamilton R, Lachapelle P, Messias AMV, Robson AG, Ueno S. ISCEV extended protocol for the stimulus–response series for light-adapted full-field ERG. Documenta Ophthalmologica. 2019;138:205–15. Published online 2019. doi:10.1007/s10633-019-09685-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch DL, Marmor MF, Brigell MG, Hamilton R, Holder GE, Tzekov R, Bach M. ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2015 update). Doc Ophthalmol. 2015;130(1):1–12. doi:10.1007/S10633-014-9473-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iohom G, Whyte A, Flynn T, O’Connor G, Shorten G. Postoperative changes in the full-field electroretinogram following sevoflurane anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004;21(4):272–78. doi:10.1097/00003643-200404000-00004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay F, Parkinson JE, Parkinson JE. Alteration of electroretinographic recordings when performed under sedation or halogenate anesthesia in a pediatric population. Doc Ophthalmol. 2003;107(3):271–79. doi:10.1023/B:DOOP.0000005336.08147.FC.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzetzi D, Hamilton R, Robinson PH, Dutton GN. Negative ERGs in mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) Hurler-Scheie (I-H/S) and Hurler (I-H)-syndromes. Documenta Ophthalmologica. 2007;114(3):153–58. doi:10.1007/s10633-007-9047-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan SM, Atchaneeyasakul LO, Appukuttan B, Mixon RN, McFarland TJ, Billingslea AM, Wilson DJ, Timothy Stout J, Weleber RG. Electronegative electroretinogram in mucolipidosis IV. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(1):45–50. doi:10.1001/archopht.120.1.45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar