Language ideological landscapes for students in university language policies: inclusion, exclusion, or hierarchy

Figures & data

Table 1. Initial data sources.

Institution	Name of document	Language	Word count
JYU	Jyväskylän Yliopiston Kielipolitiikka [University of Jyväskylä Language Policy]	Finnish	974
	Jyväskylän Yliopiston Johtosääntö	Finnish	4,425
	University of Jyväskylä Regulations	English	7,219
	Jyväskylän Yliopiston Tutkintosääntö	Finnish	4,923
	Degree Regulations of the University of Jyväskylä	English	8,712
AIU	国際教養大学学則	Japanese	11,720
	Akita International University Institutional Policies and Regulations	English	5,826
	国際教養大学大学院学則 [Akita International University Graduate School Institutional Policies and Regulations]	Japanese	6,694
	国際教養学部ミッションステートメント・3つのポリシー	Japanese	3,544
	Akita International University Policies (*mission statement included)	English	1,630
	専門職大学院ミッションステートメント・3つのポリシー	Japanese	2,106
	Graduate Program Policies (*mission statement included)	English	951

Note: The Japanese word count is its character count.

Table 2. Additional data sources.

Institution	Name of document	Language	Word count
JYU	Master’s Programmes: How to apply?	English	5,421
	Admission Criteria (*16 English-medium programs)	English	38,949
	Study Guide (*16 English-medium programs)	English	14,321
	Hakeminen Yhteishaussa [Applying in the Joint Application] (*Bachelor’s and Master’s programs)	Finnish	1,449
AIU	入学者選抜要項 [Admission Information] (*undergraduate)	Japanese	26,122
	学生募集要項 外国人留学生入試	Japanese	6,610
	Undergraduate Admission Information and Application Form for International Students	English	2,717
	専門職大学院 出願要件	Japanese	1,851
	Graduate Program Admissions	English	747
	英語集中プログラム	Japanese	1,245
	English for Academic Purposes	English	592
	日本語プログラム	Japanese	530
	Japanese Language	English	929

Note: The Japanese word count is its character count.

Figure 1. Language ideological landscape in JYU language policies.

Note: dotted figures–de jure policies, solid figures–de facto policies, double arrow–ideological dilemma, NL–national language, INL–international language.

Figure 2. Language ideological landscape in AIU language policies.

Note: dotted figures–de jure policies, solid figures–de facto policies, double arrow–ideological dilemma, NL–national language, INL–international language.

Figure 3. JYU as part of a larger international community.

Figure 4. AIU as a mediator between the local and international community.