Abstract
Aims: Since 2003, Government policies have located increasing responsibility for children's well-being on schools working in partnership with other agencies. This study sought to investigate how these policies affect the working lives and professional identities of counsellors in schools in challenging circumstances in England. Method: In-depth interviews with six school counsellors (4 primary and 2 secondary). Transcripts were analysed using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis to reveal five master themes, one of which is the focus of this paper. Findings: School counsellors derive most reward from their therapeutic work with children. Their sense of professional identity however, is affected by their positioning within schools. Counsellors with dual roles perceive themselves as ‘insiders’ with the capacity to influence and contribute meaningfully to the school's well-being agenda. Counsellors engaged on part-time contracts either independently or via an agency feel like ‘outsiders’, situated on the margins of school life and vulnerable to neglectful and oppressive practices from school leadership. Some implications for practice are considered.
Acknowledgements
With thanks to Richard Reep for his support with the analysis of data.
Notes
1. The author is course leader for a masters programme in counselling children and young people.
2. As measured by indices of national deprivation, schools ranged from 47% Free School Meals and 32% SEN pupils to 70% Free School Meals and 45% SEN pupils.