Figures & data
Table 1. Cytotoxicity of BAPs, Curcumin, and DOX.
Figure 2. (A) The cytotoxicity of all BAPs against RAW264.7 cells by MTT assay in vitro. (B) The levels of TNF-α induced by LPS stimulation in RAW 264.7 cells through ELISA analysis. PDTC was used as a positive control. The results were presented as the percent of LPS control. Each bar represents the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Statistical significance relative to the LPS group is indicated: ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01.
![Figure 2. (A) The cytotoxicity of all BAPs against RAW264.7 cells by MTT assay in vitro. (B) The levels of TNF-α induced by LPS stimulation in RAW 264.7 cells through ELISA analysis. PDTC was used as a positive control. The results were presented as the percent of LPS control. Each bar represents the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Statistical significance relative to the LPS group is indicated: ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01.](/cms/asset/a5303f1b-63ff-4292-ace8-b9e3fc9942ad/ienz_a_1635124_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3. (A) The structures of 96. (B) 96 induces HepG2 cells apoptosis. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus the negative control. (C) The effect of 96 on the expression of Bax, Bcl-2, and C-caspase-3 detected by western blot. The data are representative of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus the negative control (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test).
![Figure 3. (A) The structures of 96. (B) 96 induces HepG2 cells apoptosis. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus the negative control. (C) The effect of 96 on the expression of Bax, Bcl-2, and C-caspase-3 detected by western blot. The data are representative of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus the negative control (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test).](/cms/asset/7c55dc4f-9e31-4160-a577-1f6e66c5fad2/ienz_a_1635124_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4. (A–D) Inhibitory effects of 96 on LPS-stimulated phosphorylation of IκBα (A) and p65 (B) in RAW264.7 cells and TNF-α-stimulated phosphorylation of IκBα (C) and p65 (D) in HepG2 cells, respectively. Data represent as the mean ± SD of triplicate tests. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared with the LPS or TNF-α alone group. (E, F) Effects of 96 on the nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65 protein in the LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells (E) or TNF-α-stimulated HepG2 cells (F) by immunofluorescence assay. These experiments were repeated three times with similar results.
![Figure 4. (A–D) Inhibitory effects of 96 on LPS-stimulated phosphorylation of IκBα (A) and p65 (B) in RAW264.7 cells and TNF-α-stimulated phosphorylation of IκBα (C) and p65 (D) in HepG2 cells, respectively. Data represent as the mean ± SD of triplicate tests. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared with the LPS or TNF-α alone group. (E, F) Effects of 96 on the nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65 protein in the LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells (E) or TNF-α-stimulated HepG2 cells (F) by immunofluorescence assay. These experiments were repeated three times with similar results.](/cms/asset/84f61574-c994-41e9-9e44-074dd469b7da/ienz_a_1635124_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5. (A, B) 3D model and 2D model of the interaction between simulated 96 and the active site of Bcl-2 protein. (C, D) 3D model and 2D model of the interaction between simulated 96 with the active site of NF-κB p65.
![Figure 5. (A, B) 3D model and 2D model of the interaction between simulated 96 and the active site of Bcl-2 protein. (C, D) 3D model and 2D model of the interaction between simulated 96 with the active site of NF-κB p65.](/cms/asset/4894e714-c864-488a-9a33-2d20e13126e5/ienz_a_1635124_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6. The inhibitory effects of BAP 96 on inhibiting HepG2 xenografts growth in vivo. (A) The HepG2 xenografts growth curves very two days and mice body weight curves every 2 d. (B) The expression of Bcl-2, Bax, and C-caspase-3 in the HepG2 xenografts of five groups. (C) The morphology of the HepG2 xenografts of the five groups detected by HE staining. (D) The expression of Bcl-2 and (E) the expression of TNF-α in the HepG2 xenografts of the five groups investigated by immunohistochemistry staining. Scale bar = 60 μm (C, D, E).
![Figure 6. The inhibitory effects of BAP 96 on inhibiting HepG2 xenografts growth in vivo. (A) The HepG2 xenografts growth curves very two days and mice body weight curves every 2 d. (B) The expression of Bcl-2, Bax, and C-caspase-3 in the HepG2 xenografts of five groups. (C) The morphology of the HepG2 xenografts of the five groups detected by HE staining. (D) The expression of Bcl-2 and (E) the expression of TNF-α in the HepG2 xenografts of the five groups investigated by immunohistochemistry staining. Scale bar = 60 μm (C, D, E).](/cms/asset/58fc172d-53fd-4ef4-9609-bff1b1652d53/ienz_a_1635124_f0006_c.jpg)