Figures & data
Table 1. PCR array results following CPZ administration.
Figure 1. Timeline of experimental procedures. (A) C57BL/6 mice were given 0.2% cuprizone-containing or normal diet for 5 weeks. On the last day, 3 mice from each group were sacrificed and their brains were used for microarray analysis. The remaining 5 of each group were intraperitoneally injected with a BrdU solution (50mg/kg) every 2 hours for 6 times on the same day. Twelve hours after the last injection, mice were sacrificed and their brain tissue were used for immunochemical staining. (B) C57BL/6 mice were given 0.2% cuprizone-containing or normal diet for 5 weeks. During the 5th week, FLA (5 mg/kg, ip) or vehicle (2.28% DMSO in saline) was administrated once daily. Mice were subjected to Y maze test in the subsequent 2 d. Twenty-four 24 hours after behavioral test, mice were sacrificed and their brain tissue was used for immunohistochemical staining.
![Figure 1. Timeline of experimental procedures. (A) C57BL/6 mice were given 0.2% cuprizone-containing or normal diet for 5 weeks. On the last day, 3 mice from each group were sacrificed and their brains were used for microarray analysis. The remaining 5 of each group were intraperitoneally injected with a BrdU solution (50mg/kg) every 2 hours for 6 times on the same day. Twelve hours after the last injection, mice were sacrificed and their brain tissue were used for immunochemical staining. (B) C57BL/6 mice were given 0.2% cuprizone-containing or normal diet for 5 weeks. During the 5th week, FLA (5 mg/kg, ip) or vehicle (2.28% DMSO in saline) was administrated once daily. Mice were subjected to Y maze test in the subsequent 2 d. Twenty-four 24 hours after behavioral test, mice were sacrificed and their brain tissue was used for immunohistochemical staining.](/cms/asset/e33f36ed-9685-4cc1-8747-a01873962f6a/kccy_a_1220458_f0001_b.gif)
Figure 2. Effects of CPZ administration on cell cycle exit index. (A) Representative micrographs showing brain cells labeled by anti-BrdU and anti-Ki-67. Arrowheads point to BrdU+/Ki67− cells (cells that were BrdU positive but immunonegative for Ki-67). CC, corpus callosum; Str, striatum; lv, lateral ventricle. (B) Quantitative data showing proportions of cycling cells (quotient of BrdU+/Ki67+ cells over the total number of BrdU+ cells) in the anterior SVZ of mice. (C) Histogram representing the cell cycle exit index, which was calculated by dividing the number of BrdU+/Ki67− cells by the total number of BrdU+ cells.
![Figure 2. Effects of CPZ administration on cell cycle exit index. (A) Representative micrographs showing brain cells labeled by anti-BrdU and anti-Ki-67. Arrowheads point to BrdU+/Ki67− cells (cells that were BrdU positive but immunonegative for Ki-67). CC, corpus callosum; Str, striatum; lv, lateral ventricle. (B) Quantitative data showing proportions of cycling cells (quotient of BrdU+/Ki67+ cells over the total number of BrdU+ cells) in the anterior SVZ of mice. (C) Histogram representing the cell cycle exit index, which was calculated by dividing the number of BrdU+/Ki67− cells by the total number of BrdU+ cells.](/cms/asset/f8c967d9-e29e-4405-a4f6-4b077770ff50/kccy_a_1220458_f0002_oc.gif)
Figure 3. FLA alleviated the CPZ-induced increase in NG2 positive cells in PFC. Representative micrographs showed NG2 positive cells in the PFC of mouse from each group. CPZ-exposed mouse seemed to have the densest NG2 positive cells in the PFC among all groups. The bar equals 50 μm. The statistical analysis of quantitative data indicated that CPZ-exposure increased number of NG2 positive cells in the PFC as compared to other groups. No difference was found between any other 2 groups. Data (obtained from 4 animals in each group) were expressed as the mean ± SEM. ***p < 0.001 compared with the control group, ###p < 0.001 compared with the CPZ group.
![Figure 3. FLA alleviated the CPZ-induced increase in NG2 positive cells in PFC. Representative micrographs showed NG2 positive cells in the PFC of mouse from each group. CPZ-exposed mouse seemed to have the densest NG2 positive cells in the PFC among all groups. The bar equals 50 μm. The statistical analysis of quantitative data indicated that CPZ-exposure increased number of NG2 positive cells in the PFC as compared to other groups. No difference was found between any other 2 groups. Data (obtained from 4 animals in each group) were expressed as the mean ± SEM. ***p < 0.001 compared with the control group, ###p < 0.001 compared with the CPZ group.](/cms/asset/6f3da079-eb62-47b1-b468-01b061122f47/kccy_a_1220458_f0003_oc.gif)
Figure 4. FLA alleviated the CPZ-induced demyelination in PFC. Representative micrographs showed MBP-immunostaining in the PFC of mouse from each group. CPZ-exposed mouse showed evident myelin breakdown in the PFC, but it was not so obvious in the mouse co-administer CPZ and FLA. The bar equals 50 μm. The optical density analysis confirmed the lowest optical density of MBP-immunostaining in the CPZ group. Differences between CPZ+FLA and CON or FLA were also significant. Data (obtained from 4 animals in each group) were expressed as the means ± SEM. ***p < 0.001 compared with the control group, ###p < 0.001 compared with the CPZ group.
![Figure 4. FLA alleviated the CPZ-induced demyelination in PFC. Representative micrographs showed MBP-immunostaining in the PFC of mouse from each group. CPZ-exposed mouse showed evident myelin breakdown in the PFC, but it was not so obvious in the mouse co-administer CPZ and FLA. The bar equals 50 μm. The optical density analysis confirmed the lowest optical density of MBP-immunostaining in the CPZ group. Differences between CPZ+FLA and CON or FLA were also significant. Data (obtained from 4 animals in each group) were expressed as the means ± SEM. ***p < 0.001 compared with the control group, ###p < 0.001 compared with the CPZ group.](/cms/asset/a73ed308-5d4f-4dea-96a6-2b7369768494/kccy_a_1220458_f0004_oc.gif)
Figure 5. FLA alleviated the CPZ-induced increase in GFAP positive cells in PFC. Representative micrographs showed GFAP positive cells in the PFC of mouse from each group. CPZ-exposed mouse showed the densest GFAP positive cells in the PFC, but it was not so in the mouse co-administer CPZ and FLA. The bar equals 50 μm. The statistical analysis of the quantitative data confirmed the densest GFAP positive cells in the CPZ group. Differences between CPZ+FLA and anyone of the other groups were also significant. Data (obtained from 4 animals in each group) were expressed as the means ± SEM. ***p < 0.001 compared with the control group, ###p < 0.001 compared with the CPZ group.
![Figure 5. FLA alleviated the CPZ-induced increase in GFAP positive cells in PFC. Representative micrographs showed GFAP positive cells in the PFC of mouse from each group. CPZ-exposed mouse showed the densest GFAP positive cells in the PFC, but it was not so in the mouse co-administer CPZ and FLA. The bar equals 50 μm. The statistical analysis of the quantitative data confirmed the densest GFAP positive cells in the CPZ group. Differences between CPZ+FLA and anyone of the other groups were also significant. Data (obtained from 4 animals in each group) were expressed as the means ± SEM. ***p < 0.001 compared with the control group, ###p < 0.001 compared with the CPZ group.](/cms/asset/7ba95e9a-ab84-4219-a49a-08f70e2c3a46/kccy_a_1220458_f0005_oc.gif)
Figure 6. FLA alleviated the CPZ-induced increase inIba-1positive cells in PFC. Representative micrographs showed Iba-1 positive cells in the PFCof mouse from each group. CPZ-exposed mouse showed the densest Iba-1positive cells in the PFC, but it was not so in the mouse co-administer CPZ and FLA. The bar equals 50 μm. The statistical analysis of the quantitative data confirmed the densest Iba-1 positive cells in the CPZ group. Differences between CPZ+FLA and anyone of the other groups were also significant. Data (obtained from 4 animals in each group) were expressed as the mean ± SEM. ***p < 0.001 compared with the control group, ##p < 0.01 compared with the CPZ group.
![Figure 6. FLA alleviated the CPZ-induced increase inIba-1positive cells in PFC. Representative micrographs showed Iba-1 positive cells in the PFCof mouse from each group. CPZ-exposed mouse showed the densest Iba-1positive cells in the PFC, but it was not so in the mouse co-administer CPZ and FLA. The bar equals 50 μm. The statistical analysis of the quantitative data confirmed the densest Iba-1 positive cells in the CPZ group. Differences between CPZ+FLA and anyone of the other groups were also significant. Data (obtained from 4 animals in each group) were expressed as the mean ± SEM. ***p < 0.001 compared with the control group, ##p < 0.01 compared with the CPZ group.](/cms/asset/e947a496-6e34-48f9-8304-29f8d894b833/kccy_a_1220458_f0006_oc.gif)
Figure 7. FLA alleviated the CPZ-induced spatial working memory impairment in mice. CPZ-exposed mice showed a lowest percentage of spontaneous alternation among all groups. Differences between CPZ + FLA and anyone of the other groups were also significant. Data (obtained from10 animals in each group) were expressed as mean ± SEM. ***p < 0.001 compared with the control group, ###p < 0.001 compared with the CPZ group.
![Figure 7. FLA alleviated the CPZ-induced spatial working memory impairment in mice. CPZ-exposed mice showed a lowest percentage of spontaneous alternation among all groups. Differences between CPZ + FLA and anyone of the other groups were also significant. Data (obtained from10 animals in each group) were expressed as mean ± SEM. ***p < 0.001 compared with the control group, ###p < 0.001 compared with the CPZ group.](/cms/asset/f66dfb02-90f2-4ea4-9224-fae69d8a3599/kccy_a_1220458_f0007_b.gif)