601
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Mapping impervious surface area in the Brazilian Amazon using Landsat Imagery

, , &
Pages 172-183 | Received 12 Sep 2012, Accepted 21 Feb 2013, Published online: 14 Jun 2013

Figures & data

Table 1. Assessment of impervious surface estimation results from Landsat TM images for both study areas

Figure 1. Study areas – Santarém in Pará State and Lucas do Rio Verde in Mato Grosso State.

Figure 1. Study areas – Santarém in Pará State and Lucas do Rio Verde in Mato Grosso State.

Figure 2. Strategy of mapping impervious surface distribution with Landsat TM images.

Figure 2. Strategy of mapping impervious surface distribution with Landsat TM images.

Figure 3. Four fraction images – high albedo, low-albedo, green vegetation, and soil in Santarém – a, b, c, d and in Lucas – e, f, g, h, which were developed from Landsat TM images with the spectral mixture analysis approach.

Figure 3. Four fraction images – high albedo, low-albedo, green vegetation, and soil in Santarém – a, b, c, d and in Lucas – e, f, g, h, which were developed from Landsat TM images with the spectral mixture analysis approach.

Figure 4. False-color composites from QuickBird images showing the complexity of impervious surface distribution in Santarém and Lucas.

Figure 4. False-color composites from QuickBird images showing the complexity of impervious surface distribution in Santarém and Lucas.

Figure 5. Impervious surface images in Santarém (a) and Lucas (b), which were developed from QuickBird images.

Figure 5. Impervious surface images in Santarém (a) and Lucas (b), which were developed from QuickBird images.

Figure 6. Impervious surface images in Santarém (a) and Lucas (b), which were developed from Landsat TM images using the fraction-based method.

Figure 6. Impervious surface images in Santarém (a) and Lucas (b), which were developed from Landsat TM images using the fraction-based method.

Figure 7. Comparison of residual distribution between fraction-based and per-pixel based methods for Santarém (Left) and Lucas (Right) study areas.

Figure 7. Comparison of residual distribution between fraction-based and per-pixel based methods for Santarém (Left) and Lucas (Right) study areas.

Figure 8. Relationship between estimates from Landsat TM image and reference data from QuickBird images for Santarém (Left) and Lucas (Right).

Figure 8. Relationship between estimates from Landsat TM image and reference data from QuickBird images for Santarém (Left) and Lucas (Right).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.