879
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Impact of aerosols on terrestrial gross primary productivity in North China using an improved boreal ecosystem productivity simulator with satellite-based aerosol optical depth

, &
Pages 258-270 | Received 04 Apr 2019, Accepted 12 Oct 2019, Published online: 29 Oct 2019

Figures & data

Figure 1. The schematic diagram illustrating the interaction of solar radiation between atmospheric aerosols and terrestrial vegetation according to Kanniah et al. (Citation2012).

Figure 1. The schematic diagram illustrating the interaction of solar radiation between atmospheric aerosols and terrestrial vegetation according to Kanniah et al. (Citation2012).

Figure 2. The location of North China and the distribution of two ecosystems, 16 meteorological and radiometric stations and two validation sites in the study area. The study area is defined by Xu et al. (Citation2015), who have divided China into six regions including North China (NC), Southwest (SW), Southeast (SE), Northeast (NE), Northwest (NW) China and the Tibet Plateau (TP).

Figure 2. The location of North China and the distribution of two ecosystems, 16 meteorological and radiometric stations and two validation sites in the study area. The study area is defined by Xu et al. (Citation2015), who have divided China into six regions including North China (NC), Southwest (SW), Southeast (SE), Northeast (NE), Northwest (NW) China and the Tibet Plateau (TP).

Table 1. Initial values of the required parameters to model GPP using BEPS at 14 sites.

Figure 3. Scatterplots of daily diffuse radiation estimated by the original and the improved empirical method against the field measurements at two stations in North China under S1 (ab) and S2 (cd) aerosol scenarios.

Figure 3. Scatterplots of daily diffuse radiation estimated by the original and the improved empirical method against the field measurements at two stations in North China under S1 (ab) and S2 (cd) aerosol scenarios.

Figure 4. Seasonal difference of hourly diffuse radiation under two aerosol scenarios (S1& S2).

Figure 4. Seasonal difference of hourly diffuse radiation under two aerosol scenarios (S1& S2).

Figure 5. Validation of eight-day total GPP modeled by BEPS under two aerosol scenarios (S1& S2) at Jinzhou (cropland ecosystem) site and Dongsu (grassland ecosystem) site. N is the number of available measurements of eight-day total GPP.

Figure 5. Validation of eight-day total GPP modeled by BEPS under two aerosol scenarios (S1& S2) at Jinzhou (cropland ecosystem) site and Dongsu (grassland ecosystem) site. N is the number of available measurements of eight-day total GPP.

Figure 6. Four-year average changing rate in GPP (△GPP (%)) of the sunlit and shaded leaves above and below the canopy under two aerosol scenarios at each site. (a) Overstory sunlit GPP, (b) overstory shaded GPP, (c) understory sunlit GPP and (d) understory shaded GPP refer to GPP of the sunlit and shaded leaves above and below the canopy.

Figure 6. Four-year average changing rate in GPP (△GPP (%)) of the sunlit and shaded leaves above and below the canopy under two aerosol scenarios at each site. (a) Overstory sunlit GPP, (b) overstory shaded GPP, (c) understory sunlit GPP and (d) understory shaded GPP refer to GPP of the sunlit and shaded leaves above and below the canopy.

Figure 7. Annual total GPP and the change of GPP (△GPP, gCm−2yr−1) averaged from seven cropland ecosystem sites under two aerosol scenarios. Significance levels are suggested as * = 0.05 and ** = 0.01.

Figure 7. Annual total GPP and the change of GPP (△GPP, gCm−2yr−1) averaged from seven cropland ecosystem sites under two aerosol scenarios. Significance levels are suggested as * = 0.05 and ** = 0.01.

Figure 8. Eight-day total GPP and change in GPP (△GPP, gCm−28d−1) averaged from seven cropland ecosystem sites under two aerosol scenarios. Significance levels are suggested as * = 0.05 and ** = 0.01 and DOY indicates the day of year.

Figure 8. Eight-day total GPP and change in GPP (△GPP, gCm−28d−1) averaged from seven cropland ecosystem sites under two aerosol scenarios. Significance levels are suggested as * = 0.05 and ** = 0.01 and DOY indicates the day of year.

Figure 9. Linear regression between the increase of daily total GPP (△GPP, gCm−2d−1) and daily diffuse fraction in S2 during the growing season at seven cropland ecosystem sites for 2007.

Figure 9. Linear regression between the increase of daily total GPP (△GPP, gCm−2d−1) and daily diffuse fraction in S2 during the growing season at seven cropland ecosystem sites for 2007.

Figure 10. Scatterplots of daily diffuse fraction against daily AOD from two stations.

Figure 10. Scatterplots of daily diffuse fraction against daily AOD from two stations.

Figure 11. The distribution of elevation, aerosol concentration and land cover in North China according to Feng et al. (Citation2018a).

Figure 11. The distribution of elevation, aerosol concentration and land cover in North China according to Feng et al. (Citation2018a).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.