319
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Improving GOCI ocean color data under high solar-zenith angle over open oceans using neural networks

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2353426 | Received 26 Jan 2024, Accepted 06 May 2024, Published online: 16 May 2024

Figures & data

Figure 1. Areas of the studies and examples of the effect of high solar-zenith angle on nLw(443) for (a) climatology Chl-a image, showing the GOCI field of view: bluish color indicates clear open oceans (climatology Chl-a ≤ 0.3 mg/m3), (b) nLw(443) image in Box A on February 15, 2020, and (c) the corresponding solar-zenith angle θ0 image on the same day.

Figure 1. Areas of the studies and examples of the effect of high solar-zenith angle on nLw(443) for (a) climatology Chl-a image, showing the GOCI field of view: bluish color indicates clear open oceans (climatology Chl-a ≤ 0.3 mg/m3), (b) nLw(443) image in Box A on February 15, 2020, and (c) the corresponding solar-zenith angle θ0 image on the same day.

Table 1. Number of training data extracted (number) from years 2011, 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019 for the NN models for each month and hour combination (month, hour, and NN model name).

Figure 2. Diagram of the three-layer fully connected feedforward neural network.

Figure 2. Diagram of the three-layer fully connected feedforward neural network.

Table 2. List of 34 input variables for the neural network.

Figure 3. The GOCI-measured original nLw(412), nLw(443), nLw(490), and nLw(555) images of Box B (noted in ) at 12:00 to 16:00 on February 3, 2020 (first five columns). The last two columns are the NN-corrected nLwC(λ) images at 15:00 and 16:00.

Figure 3. The GOCI-measured original nLw(412), nLw(443), nLw(490), and nLw(555) images of Box B (noted in Figure 1a) at 12:00 to 16:00 on February 3, 2020 (first five columns). The last two columns are the NN-corrected nLwC(λ) images at 15:00 and 16:00.

Figure 4. Hourly time series (09:00–16:00) of original nLw(412), nLw(443), nLw(490), and nLw(555) (solid lines), and the corresponding NN-corrected nLwC(λ) (dashed lines) at the location P in on February 3, 2020.

Figure 4. Hourly time series (09:00–16:00) of original nLw(412), nLw(443), nLw(490), and nLw(555) (solid lines), and the corresponding NN-corrected nLwC(λ) (dashed lines) at the location P in Figure 3f on February 3, 2020.

Figure 5. Scatter/density plots of GOCI-derived original nLw(λ, θ0>65°, 16) (top row), original nLw(λ, θ0≤65°, 16) (middle row), and new nLwC(λ, θ0>65°, 16) (bottom row) versus original nLw(λ, θ0≤65°, 15) at spectral bands of 412, 443, 490, and 555 nm in the month of February 2020. The statistics show that nLw(λ, θ0>65°, 16) are underestimated by 15–30% for blue bands, and overestimated by 17% for green band. After correction, the ratio r(C)(λ, ≤65°, >65°, 15, 16) is close to the reference r(λ, ≤65°, ≤65°, 15, 16).

Figure 5. Scatter/density plots of GOCI-derived original nLw(λ, θ0>65°, 16) (top row), original nLw(λ, θ0≤65°, 16) (middle row), and new nLwC(λ, θ0>65°, 16) (bottom row) versus original nLw(λ, θ0≤65°, 15) at spectral bands of 412, 443, 490, and 555 nm in the month of February 2020. The statistics show that nLw(λ, θ0>65°, 16) are underestimated by 15–30% for blue bands, and overestimated by 17% for green band. After correction, the ratio r(C)(λ, ≤65°, >65°, 15, 16) is close to the reference r(λ, ≤65°, ≤65°, 15, 16).

Table 3. Evaluation results of r(λ, θ0, θ0, t, t′) and r(C)(λ, θ0, θ0, t, t′) (mean, median, and STD) for the month of February 2020.

Figure 6. Scatter/density plots of GOCI-derived original nLw(λ) (top row), new nLwC(λ) (middle row), and ratio of new nLwC(λ)/original nLw(λ) (bottom row) on February 3, 2020, as a function of solar-zenith angle (θ0).

Figure 6. Scatter/density plots of GOCI-derived original nLw(λ) (top row), new nLwC(λ) (middle row), and ratio of new nLwC(λ)/original nLw(λ) (bottom row) on February 3, 2020, as a function of solar-zenith angle (θ0).

Figure 7. GOCI-measured original nLw(412), nLw(443), nLw(490), and nLw(555) images of Box C noted in from 12:00–15:00 on November 5, 2014 (first four columns). The last two columns are for the NN-corrected nLwC(λ) images at 14:00 and 15:00, respectively.

Figure 7. GOCI-measured original nLw(412), nLw(443), nLw(490), and nLw(555) images of Box C noted in Figure 1a from 12:00–15:00 on November 5, 2014 (first four columns). The last two columns are for the NN-corrected nLwC(λ) images at 14:00 and 15:00, respectively.

Figure 8. Hourly time series (09:00–15:00) of original nLw(412), nLw(443), nLw(490), and nLw(555) (solid lines), and the corresponding NN-corrected nLwC(λ) (dashed lines) at the location Q noted in on November 5, 2014.

Figure 8. Hourly time series (09:00–15:00) of original nLw(412), nLw(443), nLw(490), and nLw(555) (solid lines), and the corresponding NN-corrected nLwC(λ) (dashed lines) at the location Q noted in Figure 7f on November 5, 2014.

Figure 9. Scatter/density plots of GOCI-derived original nLw(λ, θ0>65°, 15) (top row), original nLw(λ, θ0 ≤65°, 15) (middle row), and new nLwC(λ, θ0>65°, 15) (bottom row) versus original nLw(λ, θ0≤65°, 14) from the region in Box C (noted in ) at spectral bands of 412, 443, 490, and 555 nm for the month of November 2014. The statistics show that nLw(λ, θ0>65°, 15) are underestimated by 13–21% for blue bands, and overestimated by 16% for green band. After correction, the ratio r(C)(λ, ≤65°, >65°, 14, 15) is close to the reference r(λ, ≤65°, ≤65°, 14, 15).

Figure 9. Scatter/density plots of GOCI-derived original nLw(λ, θ0>65°, 15) (top row), original nLw(λ, θ0 ≤65°, 15) (middle row), and new nLwC(λ, θ0>65°, 15) (bottom row) versus original nLw(λ, θ0≤65°, 14) from the region in Box C (noted in Figure 1a) at spectral bands of 412, 443, 490, and 555 nm for the month of November 2014. The statistics show that nLw(λ, θ0>65°, 15) are underestimated by 13–21% for blue bands, and overestimated by 16% for green band. After correction, the ratio r(C)(λ, ≤65°, >65°, 14, 15) is close to the reference r(λ, ≤65°, ≤65°, 14, 15).

Table 4. Evaluation results r(λ, θ0, θ0, t, t′) and r(C)(λ, θ0, θ0, t, t′) (mean, median, and STD) for the month of November 2014.

Table 5. Evaluation results r(λ, θ0, θ0, t, t′) and r(C)(λ, θ0, θ0, t, t′) (mean, median, and STD) for all five months (January, February, October, November, and December) and in all five even years (2012, 2014, 2016, 2018, and 2020).

Figure 10. Comparison of GOCI-derived (a) original Chl-a and (b) new Chl-a in the region of Box A in on February 15, 2020.

Figure 10. Comparison of GOCI-derived (a) original Chl-a and (b) new Chl-a in the region of Box A in Figure 1a on February 15, 2020.

Figure 11. Comparison of hourly time series (09:00–16:00) for the GOCI-derived original Chl-a (solid lines) and new Chl-a (dashed lines) at the locations 1, 2, and 3 defined in on February 15, 2020.

Figure 11. Comparison of hourly time series (09:00–16:00) for the GOCI-derived original Chl-a (solid lines) and new Chl-a (dashed lines) at the locations 1, 2, and 3 defined in Figure 10a on February 15, 2020.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.