Figures & data
Figure 2. Percentage weight gain (swelling) of polymer membranes in buffers of increasing pH. Each bar represents mean ± SD (n = 3).
![Figure 2. Percentage weight gain (swelling) of polymer membranes in buffers of increasing pH. Each bar represents mean ± SD (n = 3).](/cms/asset/45910620-0c85-4992-8653-cdb10c49af3f/tdmp_a_1092011_f0002_b.gif)
Figure 3. Percentage erosion of polymer membranes in buffers of increasing pH (− sign indicates weight loss). Each bar represents mean ± SD (n = 3).
![Figure 3. Percentage erosion of polymer membranes in buffers of increasing pH (− sign indicates weight loss). Each bar represents mean ± SD (n = 3).](/cms/asset/5dffeffc-4176-4ba6-b576-6797d45a4077/tdmp_a_1092011_f0003_b.gif)
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of monomers (methacrylic acid and butyl methacrylate) and selected copolymers MAA:BMA (3:7 and 4:6).
![Figure 4. FTIR spectra of monomers (methacrylic acid and butyl methacrylate) and selected copolymers MAA:BMA (3:7 and 4:6).](/cms/asset/6689b4f9-32f1-41a3-b2a0-dd1f14cfd768/tdmp_a_1092011_f0004_b.gif)
Figure 5. 1H NMR spectra of monomers (methacrylic acid and butyl methacrylate) and selected copolymers MAA:BMA (3:7 and 4:6).
![Figure 5. 1H NMR spectra of monomers (methacrylic acid and butyl methacrylate) and selected copolymers MAA:BMA (3:7 and 4:6).](/cms/asset/cb072395-b19c-4d2f-9d81-90e6115f8bc6/tdmp_a_1092011_f0005_b.gif)
Table 1. Average molecular weights of copolymers MAA:BMA (3:7 and 4:6).
Table 2. Microspheres characterization.
Figure 7. Overlay showing PXRD diffractograms of aceclofenac, MAA:BMA (3:7 and 4:6), and formulation M3 and formulation M4.
![Figure 7. Overlay showing PXRD diffractograms of aceclofenac, MAA:BMA (3:7 and 4:6), and formulation M3 and formulation M4.](/cms/asset/94c67bb1-9d99-423e-bb88-ab8fef3aafa2/tdmp_a_1092011_f0007_oc.gif)
Figure 8. Overlay showing DSC thermograms of formulation M4 (A), copolymer MAA: BMA (4:6) (B), copolymer MAA:BMA (3:7) (C), formulation M3 (D), and aceclofenac (E).
![Figure 8. Overlay showing DSC thermograms of formulation M4 (A), copolymer MAA: BMA (4:6) (B), copolymer MAA:BMA (3:7) (C), formulation M3 (D), and aceclofenac (E).](/cms/asset/0ffc9a29-3dd1-407b-9d9a-ecfcd1b52d0b/tdmp_a_1092011_f0008_b.gif)
Figure 9. In vitro drug release profile of microparticle formulations M3 and M4. Each point represents mean ± SD (n = 3).
![Figure 9. In vitro drug release profile of microparticle formulations M3 and M4. Each point represents mean ± SD (n = 3).](/cms/asset/b0f66111-a7e4-4937-99c3-1fd7c6275404/tdmp_a_1092011_f0009_b.gif)
Table 3. Release kinetics of aceclofenac from microparticles using different kinetic equations.
Figure 10. Clinical activity scores during induction of colitis (from day 1 to day 9) and colon-to-body weight ratios (day 3, 5, 7 and 9) after TNBS administration. *Statistically significant (p < 0.05) compared with group I (healthy), as determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. Each bar represents the mean ± SD (n = 5).
![Figure 10. Clinical activity scores during induction of colitis (from day 1 to day 9) and colon-to-body weight ratios (day 3, 5, 7 and 9) after TNBS administration. *Statistically significant (p < 0.05) compared with group I (healthy), as determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. Each bar represents the mean ± SD (n = 5).](/cms/asset/12f4a337-f952-458c-8285-b09d12ed000c/tdmp_a_1092011_f0010_b.gif)
Figure 11. Clinical activity scores, colon-to-body weight ratio, and myeloperoxidase activity of group I (healthy group), group II (colitis group), group III (formulation treatment group), and group IV (standard treatment group). *Statistically significant (p < 0.05) compared with group II (colitis group), as determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. Each bar represents the mean ± SD (n = 5).
![Figure 11. Clinical activity scores, colon-to-body weight ratio, and myeloperoxidase activity of group I (healthy group), group II (colitis group), group III (formulation treatment group), and group IV (standard treatment group). *Statistically significant (p < 0.05) compared with group II (colitis group), as determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. Each bar represents the mean ± SD (n = 5).](/cms/asset/4e321bc2-7f68-4d37-b95c-02e8faa2adb9/tdmp_a_1092011_f0011_b.gif)