1,707
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Methacrylic acid-co-butylmethacrylate copolymers: design, characterization and evaluation as encapsulating material for colon targeted formulations

, , &
Pages 34-46 | Received 08 May 2015, Accepted 02 Sep 2015, Published online: 12 Oct 2015

Figures & data

Figure 1. Synthesis of copolymer of methacrylic acid and butylmethacrylate.

Figure 1. Synthesis of copolymer of methacrylic acid and butylmethacrylate.

Figure 2. Percentage weight gain (swelling) of polymer membranes in buffers of increasing pH. Each bar represents mean ± SD (n = 3).

Figure 2. Percentage weight gain (swelling) of polymer membranes in buffers of increasing pH. Each bar represents mean ± SD (n = 3).

Figure 3. Percentage erosion of polymer membranes in buffers of increasing pH (− sign indicates weight loss). Each bar represents mean ± SD (n = 3).

Figure 3. Percentage erosion of polymer membranes in buffers of increasing pH (− sign indicates weight loss). Each bar represents mean ± SD (n = 3).

Figure 4. FTIR spectra of monomers (methacrylic acid and butyl methacrylate) and selected copolymers MAA:BMA (3:7 and 4:6).

Figure 4. FTIR spectra of monomers (methacrylic acid and butyl methacrylate) and selected copolymers MAA:BMA (3:7 and 4:6).

Figure 5. 1H NMR spectra of monomers (methacrylic acid and butyl methacrylate) and selected copolymers MAA:BMA (3:7 and 4:6).

Figure 5. 1H NMR spectra of monomers (methacrylic acid and butyl methacrylate) and selected copolymers MAA:BMA (3:7 and 4:6).

Table 1. Average molecular weights of copolymers MAA:BMA (3:7 and 4:6).

Figure 6. SEM images of microparticle formulation M3 (a) and (b); and M4 (c).

Figure 6. SEM images of microparticle formulation M3 (a) and (b); and M4 (c).

Table 2. Microspheres characterization.

Figure 7. Overlay showing PXRD diffractograms of aceclofenac, MAA:BMA (3:7 and 4:6), and formulation M3 and formulation M4.

Figure 7. Overlay showing PXRD diffractograms of aceclofenac, MAA:BMA (3:7 and 4:6), and formulation M3 and formulation M4.

Figure 8. Overlay showing DSC thermograms of formulation M4 (A), copolymer MAA: BMA (4:6) (B), copolymer MAA:BMA (3:7) (C), formulation M3 (D), and aceclofenac (E).

Figure 8. Overlay showing DSC thermograms of formulation M4 (A), copolymer MAA: BMA (4:6) (B), copolymer MAA:BMA (3:7) (C), formulation M3 (D), and aceclofenac (E).

Figure 9. In vitro drug release profile of microparticle formulations M3 and M4. Each point represents mean ± SD (n = 3).

Figure 9. In vitro drug release profile of microparticle formulations M3 and M4. Each point represents mean ± SD (n = 3).

Table 3. Release kinetics of aceclofenac from microparticles using different kinetic equations.

Figure 10. Clinical activity scores during induction of colitis (from day 1 to day 9) and colon-to-body weight ratios (day 3, 5, 7 and 9) after TNBS administration. *Statistically significant (p < 0.05) compared with group I (healthy), as determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. Each bar represents the mean ± SD (n = 5).

Figure 10. Clinical activity scores during induction of colitis (from day 1 to day 9) and colon-to-body weight ratios (day 3, 5, 7 and 9) after TNBS administration. *Statistically significant (p < 0.05) compared with group I (healthy), as determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. Each bar represents the mean ± SD (n = 5).

Figure 11. Clinical activity scores, colon-to-body weight ratio, and myeloperoxidase activity of group I (healthy group), group II (colitis group), group III (formulation treatment group), and group IV (standard treatment group). *Statistically significant (p < 0.05) compared with group II (colitis group), as determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. Each bar represents the mean ± SD (n = 5).

Figure 11. Clinical activity scores, colon-to-body weight ratio, and myeloperoxidase activity of group I (healthy group), group II (colitis group), group III (formulation treatment group), and group IV (standard treatment group). *Statistically significant (p < 0.05) compared with group II (colitis group), as determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. Each bar represents the mean ± SD (n = 5).

Figure 12. Microscopic image of the colon of rat belonging to group I (healthy group), group II (colitis group), group III (formulation treatment group), and group IV (standard treatment group).

Figure 12. Microscopic image of the colon of rat belonging to group I (healthy group), group II (colitis group), group III (formulation treatment group), and group IV (standard treatment group).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.