948
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

MiR-181a-2-3p as a potential diagnostic and prognostic marker for myelodysplastic syndrome

, , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1246-1252 | Received 05 Jul 2022, Accepted 15 Nov 2022, Published online: 29 Nov 2022

Figures & data

Table 1. Clinical features of MDS patients.

Figure 1. Expression of miR-181a-2-3p in each group. (A) Relative expression of miR-181a-2-3p in MDS patients (n = 70) and normal controls (n = 32). (B) Relative expression of miR-181a-2-3p in the newly diagnosed MDS group (n = 54), sAML group (n = 16), and normal controls group (n = 32). (C) Relative expression of miR-181a-2-3p in the relatively low risk group (n = 16), the relatively high risk group (n = 38), sAML group (n = 16), and normal controls group (n = 32). (D) Relative expression of miR-181a-2-3p in each WHO subtype of MDS patients.

Figure 1. Expression of miR-181a-2-3p in each group. (A) Relative expression of miR-181a-2-3p in MDS patients (n = 70) and normal controls (n = 32). (B) Relative expression of miR-181a-2-3p in the newly diagnosed MDS group (n = 54), sAML group (n = 16), and normal controls group (n = 32). (C) Relative expression of miR-181a-2-3p in the relatively low risk group (n = 16), the relatively high risk group (n = 38), sAML group (n = 16), and normal controls group (n = 32). (D) Relative expression of miR-181a-2-3p in each WHO subtype of MDS patients.

Table 2. Comparison of clinical and molecular characteristics with miR-181-2-3p expression in MDS patients.

Figure 2. Areas under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves using miR-181a-2-3p for (A) differentiating patients with MDS from normal controls, and (B) distinguishing sAML from newly diagnosed MDS patients.

Figure 2. Areas under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves using miR-181a-2-3p for (A) differentiating patients with MDS from normal controls, and (B) distinguishing sAML from newly diagnosed MDS patients.

Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier survival curves of newly diagnosed MDS patients (n = 54) with different levels of miR-181a-2-3p expression.

Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier survival curves of newly diagnosed MDS patients (n = 54) with different levels of miR-181a-2-3p expression.

Table 3. Uni/multivariate analysis of overall survival for MDS patients excluded sAML.