1,478
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Plant-Microorganism Interactions

O-coumaric acid ester, a potential early signaling molecule in Pinus pinea and Pisolithus arhizus symbiosis established in vitro

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 297-305 | Received 02 Apr 2013, Accepted 31 Jul 2013, Published online: 03 Sep 2013

Figures & data

Figure 1. Illustration of the double-phase solid–liquid medium preparation and plant culture. (a) 1 – cover; 2 – flask; 3 and 4 – WPMS medium with perlite at the top. (b and c) 3 and 4 – WPMS medium with perlite facing down, 5 – WPML, 6 – plantlet; and 7 – root (Patent INPI N° 105239).
Figure 1. Illustration of the double-phase solid–liquid medium preparation and plant culture. (a) 1 – cover; 2 – flask; 3 and 4 – WPMS medium with perlite at the top. (b and c) 3 and 4 – WPMS medium with perlite facing down, 5 – WPML, 6 – plantlet; and 7 – root (Patent INPI N° 105239).
Figure 2. Co-culture of Pinus pinea plantlets with Pisolithus arhizus mycelium in a double-phase medium (a), negative controls: pine plantlet without fungus (b), and fungal mycelium alone (c).
Figure 2. Co-culture of Pinus pinea plantlets with Pisolithus arhizus mycelium in a double-phase medium (a), negative controls: pine plantlet without fungus (b), and fungal mycelium alone (c).
Figure 3. HPLC–UV chromatograms of the liquid medium sample collected from the co-culture of P. pinea plantlet inoculated with P. arhizus on day 2 (a) and liquid medium sample collected from P. pinea microshoots without fungal inoculation on day 2 (b). Peak at Rt 11.50 min corresponds to the unknown compound (UC).
Figure 3. HPLC–UV chromatograms of the liquid medium sample collected from the co-culture of P. pinea plantlet inoculated with P. arhizus on day 2 (a) and liquid medium sample collected from P. pinea microshoots without fungal inoculation on day 2 (b). Peak at Rt 11.50 min corresponds to the unknown compound (UC).
Figure 4. HPLC–UV chromatograms of samples from the co-culture of P. pinea plantlet and P. arhizus collected on day 2 spiked with IAA (a), rutin (b), and IBA (c). Peaks at Rt 11.84, 11.44, and 11.58 min correspond to the unknown compound (UC).
Figure 4. HPLC–UV chromatograms of samples from the co-culture of P. pinea plantlet and P. arhizus collected on day 2 spiked with IAA (a), rutin (b), and IBA (c). Peaks at Rt 11.84, 11.44, and 11.58 min correspond to the unknown compound (UC).
Figure 5. DAD total scan (a) and total ion current (b) chromatograms of the P. pinea/P. arhizus co-culture medium samples collected at day 2. UV (a), full MS (b), and MS2 of the m/z 321 ion (c) spectra of the unknown compound (UC) in the P. pinea/P. arhizus co-culture sample collected on day 2. (b) Chemical structure of o-coumaric acid.
Figure 5. DAD total scan (a) and total ion current (b) chromatograms of the P. pinea/P. arhizus co-culture medium samples collected at day 2. UV (a), full MS (b), and MS2 of the m/z 321 ion (c) spectra of the unknown compound (UC) in the P. pinea/P. arhizus co-culture sample collected on day 2. (b) Chemical structure of o-coumaric acid.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.