1,181
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Plant-Microorganism Interactions

Wood vinegar alleviates photosynthetic inhibition and oxidative damage caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci (Pst) infection in tobacco leaves

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 801-811 | Received 10 Jun 2022, Accepted 21 Jul 2022, Published online: 03 Aug 2022

Figures & data

Figure 1. Effects of WV on phenotype (a), Chl a content (b), Chl b content (c), Chl a/b (d), Chl a + b content (e), Car content (f) and Car/Chl a + b (g) of tobacco leaves infected by Pst. Note: The data in the figure are from three biological repeats (n = 3), and represent means ± standard error (SE). Significant differences were expressed by different letters (P < 0.05).

Figure 1. Effects of WV on phenotype (a), Chl a content (b), Chl b content (c), Chl a/b (d), Chl a + b content (e), Car content (f) and Car/Chl a + b (g) of tobacco leaves infected by Pst. Note: The data in the figure are from three biological repeats (n = 3), and represent means ± standard error (SE). Significant differences were expressed by different letters (P < 0.05).

Figure 2. Effects of WV on the OJIP curve (a), MR820 curve (b), Fv/Fm (c), PIABS (d), and ΔI/Io (e) of tobacco leaves infected by Pst. Note: The data in the figure are from three biological repeats (n = 3), and represent means ± standard error (SE). Significant differences were expressed by different letters (P < 0.05).

Figure 2. Effects of WV on the OJIP curve (a), MR820 curve (b), Fv/Fm (c), PIABS (d), and ΔI/Io (e) of tobacco leaves infected by Pst. Note: The data in the figure are from three biological repeats (n = 3), and represent means ± standard error (SE). Significant differences were expressed by different letters (P < 0.05).

Figure 3. Effects of WV on the VO-P (a), ΔVO-P (b), VO-J (c), ΔVO-J (d), VO-K (e), ΔVO-K (f), VJ (g), VK (h) and VL (i) of tobacco leaves infected by Pst. Note: The data in the figure are from three biological repeats (n = 3), and represent means ± standard error (SE). Significant differences were expressed by different letters (P < 0.05).

Figure 3. Effects of WV on the VO-P (a), ΔVO-P (b), VO-J (c), ΔVO-J (d), VO-K (e), ΔVO-K (f), VJ (g), VK (h) and VL (i) of tobacco leaves infected by Pst. Note: The data in the figure are from three biological repeats (n = 3), and represent means ± standard error (SE). Significant differences were expressed by different letters (P < 0.05).

Figure 4. Effects of WV on the light energy absorption and utilization parameters of tobacco leaves infected by Pst. Note: The data in the figure are from three biological repeats (n = 3), and represent means ± standard error (SE). Significant differences were expressed by different letters (P < 0.05).

Figure 4. Effects of WV on the light energy absorption and utilization parameters of tobacco leaves infected by Pst. Note: The data in the figure are from three biological repeats (n = 3), and represent means ± standard error (SE). Significant differences were expressed by different letters (P < 0.05).

Figure 5. Effects of WV on the generation rate of O2 (a), H2O2 content (b), CAT activities (c), SOD activities (d), POD activities (e), APX activities (f) and GPX activities (g) of tobacco leaves infected by Pst. Note: The data in the figure are from three biological repeats (n = 3), and represent means ± standard error (SE). Significant differences were expressed by different letters (P < 0.05).

Figure 5. Effects of WV on the generation rate of O2− (a), H2O2 content (b), CAT activities (c), SOD activities (d), POD activities (e), APX activities (f) and GPX activities (g) of tobacco leaves infected by Pst. Note: The data in the figure are from three biological repeats (n = 3), and represent means ± standard error (SE). Significant differences were expressed by different letters (P < 0.05).

Figure 6. Effects of WV on the key gene expression of photosynthetic and antioxidant enzymes of tobacco leaves infected by Pst. Note: The data in the figure are from three biological repeats (n = 3), and represent means ± standard error (SE). Significant differences were expressed by different letters (P < 0.05).

Figure 6. Effects of WV on the key gene expression of photosynthetic and antioxidant enzymes of tobacco leaves infected by Pst. Note: The data in the figure are from three biological repeats (n = 3), and represent means ± standard error (SE). Significant differences were expressed by different letters (P < 0.05).
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (15.3 KB)