6,900
Views
100
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

How can self-efficacy be increased? Meta-analysis of dietary interventions

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 270-285 | Received 02 Apr 2013, Accepted 07 Jun 2013, Published online: 15 Jul 2013
 

Abstract

Targeting individuals' beliefs that they are able to eat healthily can improve dietary-related behaviours. However, the most effective behaviour change techniques (BCTs) to promote dietary self-efficacy have not been systematically reviewed. This research addressed this gap. Studies testing the effect of interventions on healthy eating and underlying dietary-related self-efficacy, within randomised controlled trials, were systematically reviewed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and PSYCINFO. Two reviewers independently coded intervention content in both intervention and comparison groups. Data pertaining to study quality were also extracted. Random effects meta-analysis was used to calculate an overall effect size on dietary self-efficacy for each study. The associations between 26 BCTs and self-efficacy effects were calculated using meta-regression. In some of the analyses, interventions that incorporated self-monitoring (tracking one's own food-related behaviour), provided feedback on performance, prompted review of behavioural goals, provided contingent rewards (rewarding diet success), or planned for social support/social change increased dietary self-efficacy significantly more than interventions that did not. Stress management was consistently associated with self-efficacy effects across all analyses. There was strong evidence for stress management and weaker evidence for a number of other BCTs. The findings can be used to develop more effective, theory- and evidence-based behavioural interventions.

Acknowledgements

This research was funded under the Knowledge Transfer Partnership (KTP) Scheme by NHS Leeds, the UK Department of Health, the Economic and Social Research Council and the Technology Strategy Board (all UK). This KTP was awarded to Andrew Prestwich, Mark Conner, Rebecca Lawton and Peter Gardner at the Institute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, UK, to work in partnership with Candia Allen and Lucy Jackson at NHS Leeds, UK. The KTP associate for the project was Laura Elwell.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 216.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.