Figures & data
Figure 2. Risk of bias assessment based on five domains and overall bias as defined by the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (n = 51).
![Figure 2. Risk of bias assessment based on five domains and overall bias as defined by the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (n = 51).](/cms/asset/5cf31d03-b920-4755-939e-e7195215b4c1/rhpr_a_2163917_f0002_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Characteristics of included RCTs and intervention descriptions.
Figure 3. Standardised mean difference (95% CI) of the effect of the primary interventions compared with passive control groups on symptom burden at post-treatment (n = 32).a
![Figure 3. Standardised mean difference (95% CI) of the effect of the primary interventions compared with passive control groups on symptom burden at post-treatment (n = 32).a](/cms/asset/7a6fb839-c302-47c9-901d-e61222e611fe/rhpr_a_2163917_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. Standardised mean difference (95% CI) of the effect of the primary interventions compared with passive control groups on quality of life at post-treatment (n = 33).
![Figure 4. Standardised mean difference (95% CI) of the effect of the primary interventions compared with passive control groups on quality of life at post-treatment (n = 33).](/cms/asset/9cabaac8-381a-47cc-a080-70a4e5b877dc/rhpr_a_2163917_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. Proportion of studies (95% CI) favouring the intervention (SMD > 0) and proportion of interventions (95% CI) with effect (SMD ≥ 0.2) at post-treatment, ≤3 month follow-up and >3 month follow-up according to risk of bias distribution. SMD = standardised mean difference.
![Figure 5. Proportion of studies (95% CI) favouring the intervention (SMD > 0) and proportion of interventions (95% CI) with effect (SMD ≥ 0.2) at post-treatment, ≤3 month follow-up and >3 month follow-up according to risk of bias distribution. SMD = standardised mean difference.](/cms/asset/bf846c20-1136-4bd5-90da-d5805e982684/rhpr_a_2163917_f0005_ob.jpg)
Figure 6. Frequency of behaviour change techniques applied in studies comparing the primary intervention with an active control group (n = 23) and/or a passive control group (n = 38).
![Figure 6. Frequency of behaviour change techniques applied in studies comparing the primary intervention with an active control group (n = 23) and/or a passive control group (n = 38).](/cms/asset/106db62d-324e-4304-926c-09061648d568/rhpr_a_2163917_f0006_ob.jpg)
Table 2. Effect (SMD> = 0.2) of interventions and index of potential of BCTs (95% BCI) applied in each symptom cluster in studies with passive control groups (n = 38)a,b,c.
Table 3. Effect (SMD> = 0.2) of interventions and index of potential of BCTs (95% BCI) applied in each symptom cluster in studies with active control groups (n = 21)a,b,c,d.
Table 4. Definitions (Michie & Atkins, Citation2014) and examples of behaviour change techniques with potential effect.