3,339
Views
36
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Effect of melting modes on microstructure and tribological properties of selective laser melted AlSi10Mg alloy

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, & show all
Pages 570-582 | Received 15 Jun 2020, Accepted 15 Aug 2020, Published online: 28 Sep 2020

Figures & data

Figure 1. (a) SE images of AlSi10Mg powder (inset shows cross-sectioned powders), and (b) particle size distribution.

Figure 1. (a) SE images of AlSi10Mg powder (inset shows cross-sectioned powders), and (b) particle size distribution.

Figure 2. OM images showing typical surface morphologies of SLM specimens fabricated in two melting modes: (a) CM, and (b) KM.

Figure 2. OM images showing typical surface morphologies of SLM specimens fabricated in two melting modes: (a) CM, and (b) KM.

Figure 3. OM images of SLM AlSi10Mg specimens fabricated in two melting modes: (a) and (c) CM, and (b) and (d) KM.

Figure 3. OM images of SLM AlSi10Mg specimens fabricated in two melting modes: (a) and (c) CM, and (b) and (d) KM.

Figure 4. XRD patterns from the alloy powder and the SLM specimens.

Figure 4. XRD patterns from the alloy powder and the SLM specimens.

Figure 5. SE and inset BF TEM images of SLM AlSi10Mg specimens for the two melting modes: (a) and (c) CM, and (b) and (d) KM.

Figure 5. SE and inset BF TEM images of SLM AlSi10Mg specimens for the two melting modes: (a) and (c) CM, and (b) and (d) KM.

Figure 6. (a) Inverse pole figure (IPF) map and (b) image quality (IQ) map on the top view of the KM specimen.

Figure 6. (a) Inverse pole figure (IPF) map and (b) image quality (IQ) map on the top view of the KM specimen.

Figure 7. HAADF-STEM image of the cells in KMP and corresponding EDS mapping of the main elements (Al, Si, Mg and Fe).

Figure 7. HAADF-STEM image of the cells in KMP and corresponding EDS mapping of the main elements (Al, Si, Mg and Fe).

Figure 8. Schematic representation of thermal history during (a) CM and (b) KM.

Figure 8. Schematic representation of thermal history during (a) CM and (b) KM.

Figure 9. (a) Friction coefficients versus sliding time and (b) wear rates for the SLM and as-cast specimens.

Figure 9. (a) Friction coefficients versus sliding time and (b) wear rates for the SLM and as-cast specimens.

Table 1. Friction coefficients (μ) of the steady state wear.

Figure 10. Topography and 3D surface profiles of the worn surfaces, and SE images of debris for (a) CM, (b) KM and (c) as-cast specimens.

Figure 10. Topography and 3D surface profiles of the worn surfaces, and SE images of debris for (a) CM, (b) KM and (c) as-cast specimens.

Figure 11. (a) Nanoindentation positions in the two molten pools from the top view in the KM specimen; (b) corresponding load-displacement curves; (c) the values of H and Er; and (d) H/Er and H3/Er2 ratios.

Figure 11. (a) Nanoindentation positions in the two molten pools from the top view in the KM specimen; (b) corresponding load-displacement curves; (c) the values of H and Er; and (d) H/Er and H3/Er2 ratios.