0
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Stabilising mechanism of cathode jet and droplet transfer in hybrid-laser–GMAW-based directed energy deposition of titanium alloy

, , , , , , , & show all
Article: e2384659 | Received 08 May 2024, Accepted 19 Jul 2024, Published online: 02 Aug 2024

Figures & data

Figure 1. (a) Diagram of hybrid laser–GMAW-based DED; (b) High-speed photography system; (c) Spectral information acquisition system.

Figure 1. (a) Diagram of hybrid laser–GMAW-based DED; (b) High-speed photography system; (c) Spectral information acquisition system.

Table 1. Chemical compositions of Ti6Al4 V base metal and wire.

Figure 2. The macroscopic images of: (a) GMAW-based DED; (b) Hybrid-laser–GMAW-based DED.

Figure 2. The macroscopic images of: (a) GMAW-based DED; (b) Hybrid-laser–GMAW-based DED.

Table 2. Statistical results of forming quality.

Figure 3. Process flow for calculating arc temperature using the Fowler–Milne method.

Figure 3. Process flow for calculating arc temperature using the Fowler–Milne method.

Figure 4. Electrical signal waveform and arc image of GMAW-based DED.

Figure 4. Electrical signal waveform and arc image of GMAW-based DED.

Figure 5. Electrical signal waveform and arc image of hybrid laser–GMAW-based DED.

Figure 5. Electrical signal waveform and arc image of hybrid laser–GMAW-based DED.

Figure 6. Spatial distributions of Ti Ⅰ and Ti Ⅱ particles.

Figure 6. Spatial distributions of Ti Ⅰ and Ti Ⅱ particles.

Figure 7. Dynamic droplet transfer behaviours.

Figure 7. Dynamic droplet transfer behaviours.

Figure 8. (a) Temperatures for thermionic emission at various current density levels [Citation33]; (b) Current density of thermionic emission varies with temperature for various materials

Figure 8. (a) Temperatures for thermionic emission at various current density levels [Citation33]; (b) Current density of thermionic emission varies with temperature for various materials

Figure 9. Numerical result of the molten pool in hybrid-laser–GMAW-based DED.

Figure 9. Numerical result of the molten pool in hybrid-laser–GMAW-based DED.

Figure 10. Schematic of cathode jet generation.

Figure 10. Schematic of cathode jet generation.

Figure 11. Plasma temperature: (a) calculated arc temperature in GMAW-based DED using the Fowler–Milne method; (b) validation using the Boltzmann plot method.

Figure 11. Plasma temperature: (a) calculated arc temperature in GMAW-based DED using the Fowler–Milne method; (b) validation using the Boltzmann plot method.

Figure 12. (a) Equilibrium composition of Ar-50 at%Ti; (b) Relationship curve between critical temperature and equilibrium composition.

Figure 12. (a) Equilibrium composition of Ar-50 at%Ti; (b) Relationship curve between critical temperature and equilibrium composition.

Figure 13. (a) Statistics of droplet growth time, droplet transfer time and cathode jet angle; (b) Statistics of spatter number per layer in DED; (c) Schematic diagram of force analysis.

Figure 13. (a) Statistics of droplet growth time, droplet transfer time and cathode jet angle; (b) Statistics of spatter number per layer in DED; (c) Schematic diagram of force analysis.

Figure 14. Summarisation of the laser effects.

Figure 14. Summarisation of the laser effects.
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download Zip (133.9 KB)

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [Dongshen Wu], upon reasonable request.