https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3988-2836
Figures & data
Table 1. Inclusion criteria.
Table 2. Deductive codes based on QUEST 2.0 satisfaction items.
Table 3. Location, science discipline, design, and target population of included studies.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow chart of selection process.
PRISMA FLOW chart depicting the selection process of articles. The process includes identification (CINAHL n = 347; Pubmed n = 356; Academic Search Elite n = 76), screening (n = 683), and inclusion (n = 45) of found articles. A total of 548 articles were excluded based on title and abstract screening, and 93 articles were excluded against the inclusion criteria.
Figure 2. Country-specific distribution.
World map showing the country-specific distribution of articles included in the review. The table below lists the countries with frequencies and percentages: Canada (11, 24.4%), Sweden (9, 20%), Germany (5, 11.1%), and others.
Table 4. Disciplinary & methodological distribution.
Table 5. Mono/Multidisciplinary distribution & publications by year.
Figure 3. Code frequency based on device and service satisfaction items.
Treemap chart showing the frequency of codes given in the included literature based on device and service satisfaction items from QUEST 2.0. "Easy to use" is the largest category with 28 codes, followed by "Comfort" with 20 codes, and "Safety" with 14 codes. Other categories include "Effectiveness" (11), "Dimensions" (10), "Professional services" (9), "Adjustments" (8), "Weight" (8), "Follow-up services" (6), "Repairs & servicing" (5), "Service delivery" (4), and "Durability" (3).
Table 6. Absolute frequencies of the codes assigned for each publication.
Table 7. Rollator satisfaction via QUEST 2.0.