The usability of rollators as part of the human-centred quality of mobility devices: a systematic narrative literature review

References

• International Organization for Standardization. ISO 11199-2:2021(en), assistive products for walking manipulated by both arms—requirements and test methods—part 2: rollators; 2024 [Internet]. Iso.org [cited Feb 20]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:11199:-2:ed-3:v1:en.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt A, Iwarsson S, Stahl A. Satisfaction with rollators among community-living users: a follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(7):343–353. doi: 10.1080/0963828021000058495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holz A, Bennett A, Freethy A, et al. Exploring the views of individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on the use of rollators: a qualitative study. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2018;38(1):49–53. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okuyama K, Matuo Y. Effects of a rollator on fall prevention in community-dwelling people with Parkinson’s disease: a prospective cohort study. Clin Park Relat Disord. 2023;8:100190. doi: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2023.100190.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ekvall Hansson E, Akar Y, Liu T, et al. Gait parameters when walking with or without rollator on different surface characteristics: a pilot study among healthy individuals. BMC Res Notes. 2022;15(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06196-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costamagna E, Thies SB, Kenney LPJ, et al. Objective measures of rollator user stability and device loading during different walking scenarios. PLOS One. 2019;14(1):e0210960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupret I, Gräske J, Venn R, et al. Erste Ergebnisse der Evaluation eines digitalen Rollators [Initial results of the evaluation of a digital rollator]. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2022;56(5):388–394.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuboshima Y, McIntosh J. Housing design that improves the independence and safety for older adults using a walker. Appl Ergon. 2021;97:103539. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omaña H, Madou E, Hunter SW. The effects on gait of 4-wheeled walker use in people with Alzheimer’s disease dementia and gait impairment: a pilot study. J Alzheimer Dis. 2022;89:399–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omana HA, Madou E, Divine A, et al. The effect of first-time 4-wheeled walker use on the gait of younger and older adults. Pm R. 2022;14(11):1333–1342. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12700.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hill K, Ng LWC, Cecins N, et al. Effect of using a wheeled walker on physical activity and sedentary time in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised cross-over trial. Lung. 2020;198(1):213–219. doi: 10.1007/s00408-019-00297-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter SW, Omana H, Madou E, et al. Effect of dual-tasking on walking and cognitive demands in adults with Alzheimer’s dementia experienced in using a 4-wheeled walker. Gait Posture. 2020;77:164–170. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.01.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddas R, Lieberman IH, Kakar RS. A comparison of muscular activity during gait between walking sticks and a walker in patients with adult degenerative scoliosis. Spine Deform. 2019;7:454–466.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edelstein J. 36 – Canes, crutches, and walkers. In: Webster JB, Murphy DP, editors. Atlas of orthoses and assistive devices. Fifth Edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2019.377–382.e3.
   Google Scholar
• van Riel KMM, Hartholt KA, Panneman MJM, et al. Four-wheeled walker related injuries in older adults in the Netherlands. Inj Prev. 2014;20(1):11–15. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charette C, Best KL, Smith EM, et al. Walking aid use in Canada: prevalence and demographic characteristics among community-dwelling users. Phys Ther. 2018;98(7):571–577. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitajima E, Moriuchi T, Iso N, et al. Actual use of and satisfaction associated with rollators and “shopping carts” among frail elderly Japanese people using day-service facilities. Disabil Rehab Assist Technol. 2017;12:519–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmer M, Riener R, Walsh CJ, et al. Mobility related physical and functional losses due to aging and disease – a motivation for lower limb exoskeletons. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2019;16(1):1–21. doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0458-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Statista. Men and women by age group Germany; 2022 [Internet]. statista.com [cited 2024 Feb 20]. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1086197/men-and-women-by-age-group-germany/.
   Google Scholar
• Cubo E, Moore CG, Leurgans S, et al. Wheeled and standard walkers in Parkinson’s disease patients with gait freezing. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2003;10(1):9–14. doi: 10.1016/s1353-8020(03)00060-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir-Hunter SW, Montero-Odasso M. The attentional demands of ambulating with an assistive device in older adults with Alzheimer’s disease. Gait Posture. 2017;54:202–208. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.03.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill K, Goldstein R, Gartner EJ, et al. Daily utility and satisfaction with rollators among persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2008;89:1108–1113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaes AW, Annegarn J, Meijer K, et al. The effects of a “new” walking aid on exercise performance in patients with COPD: a randomized crossover trial. Chest. 2012;141(5):1224–1232. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-1076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaes AW, Meijer K, Delbressine JM, et al. Efficacy of walking aids on self-paced outdoor walking in individuals with COPD: a randomized cross-over trial. Respirology. 2015;20(6):932–939. doi: 10.1111/resp.12570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta R, Goldstein R, Brooks D. The acute effects of a rollator in individuals with COPD. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2006;26(2):107–111. doi: 10.1097/00008483-200603000-00011.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Probst VS, Troosters T, Coosemans I, et al. Mechanisms of improvement in exercise capacity using a rollator in patients with COPD. Chest. 2004;126(4):1102–1107. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.4.1102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honeyman P, Barr P, Stubbing DG. Effect of a walking aid on disability, oxygenation, and breathlessness in patients with chronic airflow limitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1996;16(1):63–67. doi: 10.1097/00008483-199601000-00008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cha E, Jung K-I, Yoo W-K, et al. Non-Powered automatic velocity-controlled wheeled walker improves gait and satisfaction in patients with hip fracture when walking downhill: a cross-over study. Gait Posture. 2020;82:227–232. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.09.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Ministry of Education and Research. Ambulant vor stationär [Outpatient before inpatient] [Internet]. Gesundheitsforschung-bmbf.de [cited 2024 Feb 20]. Available from: https://www.gesundheitsforschung-bmbf.de/de/ambulant-vor-stationar-6788.php.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Global strategy and action plan on ageing and health [Internet]; 2017. Geneva: World Health Organization [cited 2024 Feb 20]. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/329960.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) [Internet]; 2024. Who.int. [cited Feb 20]. Available from: https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/international-classification-of-functioning-disability-and-health.
   Google Scholar
• Goins RT, Jones J, Schure M, et al. Older adults’ perceptions of mobility: a metasynthesis of qualitative studies. GERONT. 2015;55(6):929–942. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu014.
   Google Scholar
• Brännström H, Bäckman M, Santamäki Fischer R. Walking on the edge: meanings of living in an ageing body and using a walker in everyday life – a phenomenological hermeneutic study. Int J Older People Nurs. 2013;8:116–122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomas B, Connelly D, Laliberte-Rudman D. The impact and use of walkers among older adults: a pilot. Phys Occup Ther Geriat. 2008;27(1):36–72. doi: 10.1080/02703180802275327.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch T, Forlizzi J, Hyder E, et al. The ELDer project: social, emotional, and environmental factors in the design of eldercare technologies. Proceedings on the 2000 conference on Universal Usability – CUU ‘00 [Internet]. Arlington, Virginia, United States: ACM Press; 2000. p. 72–79.
   Google Scholar
• Boerema ST, van Velsen L, Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR, et al. Value-based design for the elderly: an application in the field of mobility aids. Assist Technol. 2017;29(2):76–84. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2016.1208303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9241-11:2018(en), ergonomics of human-system interaction—part 11: usability: definitions and concepts [Internet]. Iso.org [cited 2024 Feb 20]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-11:ed-2:v1:en.
   Google Scholar
• DIN German Institute for Standardisation e.V. Ergonomie der Mensch-System-Interaktion – Teil 11: Gebrauchstauglichkeit: Begriffe und Konzepte (ISO 9241-11:2018); Deutsche Fassung EN ISO 9241-11:2018 [Ergonomics of human-system interaction Part 11: usability: definitions and concepts, Berlin] [Internet]; 2018 [cited 2022 Nov 23]. Available from: https://perinorm-s.redi-bw.de/perinorm/fulltext.ashx?fulltextid=6d6f269f13d34e049d4f956074034b6b&userid=52751c6c-9445-45ed-9462-ef89746e003c.
   Google Scholar
• Sarodnick F, Brau H. Methoden der Usability Evaluation: wissenschaftliche Grundlagen und praktische Anwendung [Methods of usability evaluation]. 3., unveränderte Auflage. Bern: Hogrefe; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Demers L, Monette M, Lapierre Y, et al. Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(1–3):21–30. doi: 10.1080/09638280110066352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavery D, Cockton G, Atkinson MP. Comparison of evaluation methods using structured usability problem reports. Behav Inform Technol. 1997;16(4–5):246–266. doi: 10.1080/014492997119824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, et al. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(1):45–53.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Thorne S, Malterud K. Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? Eur J Clin Invest. 2018;48(6):e12931. doi: 10.1111/eci.12931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n160. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MTD-Verlag. Entwicklung von Absatz, Umsatz und Durchschnittspreis von Rollatoren in Deutschland 2008 bis 2012 [Development of sales, revenue, and average price of rollators in Germany from 2008 to 2012] [Internet]. Statista; 2012 [cited 2024 Jun 7]. Available from: https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/334410/umfrage/entwicklung-von-absatz-umsatz-und-durchschnittspreis-von-rollatoren-in-deutschland/.
   Google Scholar
• Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, et al. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wressle E, Samuelsson K. User satisfaction with mobility assistive devices. Scandinav J Occup Ther. 2004;11(3):143–150. doi: 10.1080/11038120410020728.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelsson K, Wressle E. User satisfaction with mobility assistive devices: an important element in the rehabilitation process. Disabil Rehab. 2008;30:551–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. Item analysis of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST). Assistive Technol. 2000;12(2):96–105. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2000.10132015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VERBI Software. MAXQDA 2022. [software]. VERBI Software, Berlin; 2021; Available from: www.maxqda.com.
   Google Scholar
• Raijmakers M. Consumer survey into complaints rollators. In: Marincek C, Bühler C, Knops H, Andrich R, editors. Assistive Technology - Added Value to the Quality of Life. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2001. p. 199–203.
   Google Scholar
• Hjalmarson J, Svensson H, Glimskär B. Accessibility for elderly using a four-wheeled walker – an interview and observation analysis. In: Encarnação P, Azevedo L, Gelderblom GJ, Newell A, Mathiassen NE, editors. Assistive Technology: From Research to Practice. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2013. p. 27–33.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh T, Petrie H. Understanding the lived experience of five individuals with mobility aids. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;229:582–593.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miyasike-Dasilva V, Tung JY, Zabukovec JR, et al. Use of mobility aids reduces attentional demand in challenging walking conditions. Gait Posture. 2013;37(2):287–289. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.06.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellmon R, Pezzillo K, Eichhorn G, et al. Changes in dual-task voice reaction time among elders who use assistive devices. J Geriat Phys Ther. 2006;29(2):74–80. doi: 10.1519/00139143-200608000-00006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wright DL, Kemp TL. The dual-task methodology and assessing the attentional demands of ambulation with walking devices… including commentary by Winstein CJ with author response. Phys Ther. 1992;72(4):306–312. doi: 10.1093/ptj/72.4.306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindemann U, Schwenk M, Klenk J, et al. Problems of older persons using a wheeled walker. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2016;28:215–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfqvist C, Nygren C, Brandt A, et al. Very old Swedish women’s experiences of mobility devices in everyday occupation: a longitudinal case study. Scand J Occup Ther. 2009;16(3):181–192. doi: 10.1080/11038120802613108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson L. The importance of the 4-wheeled walker for elderly women living in their home environment – a three-year study. The Swedish Handicap Institute [Internet]; 2001 [cited 2023 May 25]; Available from: https://www.cs.cmu.edu/∼flo/course-spring03/Swedish_report_on_Walker.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wennberg H, Hydén C, Ståhl A. Barrier-free outdoor environments: older peoples’ perceptions before and after implementation of legislative directives. Transport Pol. 2010;17(6):464–474. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.04.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pippin K, Femie GR. Designing devices that are acceptable to the frail elderly: a new understanding based upon how older people perceive a walker. TAD. 1997;7(1-2):93–102. doi: 10.3233/TAD-1997-71-211.
   Google Scholar
• Schülein S, Barth J, Rampp A, et al. Instrumented gait analysis: a measure of gait improvement by a wheeled walker in hospitalized geriatric patients. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2017;14(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0228-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindemann U, Schwenk M, Schmitt S, et al. Effect of uphill and downhill walking on walking performance in geriatric patients using a wheeled walker. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2017;50(6):483–487. doi: 10.1007/s00391-016-1156-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel J. A guideline for the design of a four-wheeled walker. Assist Technol. 1997;9:116–129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pils K, Neumann F, Meisner W, et al. Predictors of falls in elderly people during rehabilitation after hip fracture–who is at risk of a second one? Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2003;36(1):16–22. doi: 10.1007/s00391-003-0142-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt L, Lucki K, Bach M, et al. Rollator use and functional outcome of geriatric rehabilitation. J Rehab Res Develop. 2010;47:151–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu HH. Assessment of rolling walkers used by older adults in senior-living communities. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2009;9(2):124–130. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2008.00497.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takanokura M. Theoretical optimization of usage of four-wheeled walker and body posture of elderly users for comfortable steady walking. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:4519–4522.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takanokura M. Optimal handgrip height of four-wheeled walker on various road conditions to reduce muscular load for elderly users with steady walking. J Biomech. 2010;43:843–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caronni A, Ramella M, Arcuri P, et al. The Rasch analysis shows poor construct validity and low reliability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 (QUEST 2.0) Questionnaire. IJERPH. 2023;20(2):1036. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar