ABSTRACT
In engineering practice, liquefaction severity map is usually developed from liquefaction potential index (LPI) which is estimated using in-situ tests, such as cone penetration tests (CPTs). To efficiently perform in-situ tests for obtaining a reliable liquefaction severity map, it is advantageous to use adaptive sampling strategy, which uses results from initial measurements to sequentially decide CPT number and locations in a later stage. For example, the optimal number and locations of subsequent CPTs may be determined for maximising the reduction of overall uncertainty in the interpolated LPI data over the map obtained from a preliminary stage. However, uncertainty-based adaptive sampling might not provide optimal results for liquefaction severity mapping because the threshold of liquefaction severity classification is not considered. To properly evaluate the reliability of interpreted liquefaction severity map, a reliability index, , is proposed in this study and further used to determine the optimal number and locations of in-situ tests. The proposed risk-informed adaptive sampling strategy is illustrated and compared with the uncertainty-based strategy. The example shows that the proposed method is more efficient than the uncertainty-based strategy.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).