Teaching and learning about the Holocaust: a systematic scoping review of existing research

Figures & data

Table 1. PICO framework.

Population	All kinds of populations were included, e.g. pupils in all grades, teachers and the public. We excluded studies that targeted Jewish populations, since the main purpose was to learn about how education can or may prevent antisemtism.
Intervention	Educational interventions that included components of TLH not interventions that targeted the Israel-Palestine conflict
Comparison	There was no requirement that the studies must include a comparison with alternative interventions or control groups for inclusion in the scoping review.
Outcome	There were no restrictions concerning specific outcomes, i.e. all outcomes of TLH that were evaluated in the studies were of interest. There were studies, specifically within educational research and arts research, that had a component of TLH, but where the purpose of the studies was to investigate specific research questions that were not related to TLH, these were excluded.
Study design	Practice-based empirical research using quantitative, qualitative or mixed methods design
Language	No restrictions on language
Year	Not studies published before 1945

Figure 1. Screening and relevance assessment phase.

Figure 2. Number of publications presented by year of publication.

Table 2. Included studies sorted by country.

Included studies sorted by country (n)
USA	77
UK	13
Israel	1
Scotland	7
Canada	3
Netherlands	3
Poland	2
Germany	7
UK/USA	1
Latvia	1
South Africa	1

Figure 3. Percentage of included studies presented by study design.

Figure 4. Number of publications per first author.

Figure 5. Co-authorship map.

Figure 6. Map of keywords used in the included studies.