![Sample our Environment & Sustainability journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5935/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Environment-Sustainability.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
Research investigating the effectiveness of proximizing climate change, guided by Construal Level Theory (CLT), has produced mixed results regarding its ability to foster climate engagement. This study aimed to clarify these mixed findings by examining the roles of climate anxiety and efficacy perception as potential moderating factors. Using data from 1,045 adults, a double-moderated-mediation model was tested, focusing on the interplay between perceived psychological distance, construal level, climate anxiety, and efficacy perception. The results revealed that construal level fully mediated the relationship between perceived psychological distance and pro-environmental intention. Furthermore, the data showed that both climate anxiety and efficacy perception amplified this relationship. Specifically, participants with higher climate anxiety tended to construe psychologically closer climate risks more concretely and distant risks more abstractly. Participants with higher efficacy perception adopted more concrete, lower-level construals when viewing climate change as an imminent threat. However, when both climate anxiety and efficacy perceptions were considered, climate anxiety attenuated the influence of efficacy perception. The study concludes by discussing the theoretical and practical implications of these findings for enhancing the effectiveness of climate change communication.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes
1 This limit is critical because exceeding this threshold is believed to cause substantial environmental harm (Plumer, Citation2023).
2 In his recent review article, Kim (Citation2023) also underscores the importance of anxiety and efficacy as crucial factors and areas for future research.