https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3227-1783
Figures & data
Figure 1. Overview of the map “Experienced Tampere..”
Figure 2. Use of analytical lenses in the identification phase.
Figure 3. Conviviality potentials and obstacles in commercial gathering places.
Figure 4. Observation photographs from commercial gathering places. Seating arrangements offer socio-functional possibilities for resting, meeting acquaintances, watching other people, playing, and working. Socio-spatial factors such as type and arrangement of seating, as well ass socio-temporal factors such as daily rhythms affect these potentials.Footnote3
Figure 5. Conviviality potentials and obstacles in public activity facilities.
Figure 6. Observation photographs from public activity facilities. Socio-spatial potentials are supported, inter alia, by sensory characteristics of nature, dignified old buildings, openings connecting facilities to open public space, and open internal spatial structure. Socio-spatial obstacles in turn are caused by deficiencies in accessibility, non-inviting appearances, and rigid boundaries between activity facilities and public space.
Figure 7. Use of the lenses in design projections.
Figure 8. Active living rooms.
Figure 9. Sensory urban oases.
