Conviviality in the city: experience-based spatial design against the segregation of places

References

• Alidoust, S., C. Bosman, and G. Holden. 2019. “Planning for Healthy Ageing: How the Use of Third Places Contributes to the Social Health of Older Populations.” Ageing & Society 39 (7): 1459–1484. doi:10.1017/S0144686X18000065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, A. 2002. “Ethnicity and the Multicultural City: Living with Diversity.” Environment and Planning A 34: 959–980. doi:10.1068/a3537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, F. J., L. Johnson, and E. Warner. 2020. “Lived Experiences of Community in an Outer Suburb of Melbourne, Australia.” Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 11 (3): 257–276. doi:10.1080/17549175.2017.1363077.
   Google Scholar
• Back, L., and S. Sinha. 2016. “Multicultural Conviviality in the Midst of Racism’s Ruins.” Journal of Intercultural Studies 37 (5): 517–532. doi:10.1080/07256868.2016.1211625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baeza, J. L., D. Cerrone, and K. Männigo. 2017. “Comparing Two Methods for Urban Complexity Calculation Using the Shannon-Wiener Index.” In WIT Transactions on Ecology and Environment, edited by C. A. Brebbia, E. Marco, J. Longhurst, and C. Booth, Vol. 226, 369–378. Ashurst (Southampton): Ashurst: WIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, N. 2020. “Understanding the Processes of Changing Segregation.” In Handbook of Urban Segregation, edited by S. Musterd, 367–377. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cucca, R. 2020. “Spatial Segregation and the Quality of the Local Environment in Contemporary Cities.” In Handbook of Urban Segregation, edited by S. Musterd, 185–199. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Faehnle, M., P. Bäcklund, L. Tyrväinen, J. Niemelä, and V. Yli-Pelkonen. 2014. “How Can Residents’ Experiences Inform Planning of Urban Green Infrastructure? Case Finland.” Landscale and Urban Planning 130: 171–183. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.07.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincher, R., and K. Iveson. 2008. Planning and Diversity in the City. Redistribution, Recognition and Encounter. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gehl, J. 1987. Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Copenhagen: Danish Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gehl, J. 2010. Cities for People. Washington: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hiss, T. 1990. The New Experience of Place: A New Way of Looking at and Dealing with Our Radically Changing Cities and Countryside. London: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jull, J., A. Giles, and I. D. Graham. 2017. “Community-Based Participatory Research and Integrated Knowledge Translation: Advancing the Co-creation of Knowledge.” Implementation Science 12 (1): 150. doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0696-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, M.-P. 2013. “Beyond Space (As We Knew It): Toward Temporally Integrated Geographies of Segregation, Health, and Accessibility.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 (5): 1078–1086. doi:10.1080/00045608.2013.792177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurier, E., and C. Philo. 2006. “Cold Shoulders and Napkins Handed: Gesture of Responsibility.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 31 (2): 193–207. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2006.00205.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leino, H. , and Puumala, E. 2021 What can cocreation do for the citizens? Applying co-creation for the promotion of participation in the city. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 39 (4) 781–799 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loukaitou-Sideris, A., M. Brozen, and L. Levy-Storms. 2014. “Placemaking for an Aging Population: Guidelines for Senior-Friendly Parks.” UCLA: The Ralph and Goldy Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/450871hz
   Google Scholar
• Low, S., D. Taplin, and S. Scheld. 2005. Rethinking Urban Parks: Public Space and Cultural Diversity. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. 1995/1984. “The Immature Arts of City Design.” In City Sense and City Design, edited by T. Banerjee and M. Southworth, 498–510. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A. 2014. Urban Design, Space and Society. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A. 2011. “Social Exclusion and Space.” In City Reader, edited by R. T. Legates and F. J. Stout, 186–191. Hoboken, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A. 2020. “Can the Public Space Be a Counterweight to Social Segregation?” In Handbook of Urban Segregation, edited by S. Musterd, 170–184. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Malpas, J. E. 2018. Place and Experience: A Philosophical Topography. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maununaho, K. 2016 Political, Practical and Architectural Notions of the Concept of the Right to the City in Neighbourhood Regeneration. Nordic Journal of Migration Research 6 (1) doi:10.1515/njmr-2016-0008 .
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, V. 2014. The Street. A Quintessential Social Public Space. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. 2003. The Right to the City. Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space. London: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. 2017. “People’s Park Again: On the End and Ends of Public Space.” Environment and Planning A 49 (3): 503–518. doi:10.1177/0308518X15611557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musterd, S. 2020a. “Urban Segregation: Contexts, Domains, Dimensions and Approaches.” In Handbook of Urban Segregation, edited by S. Musterd, 2–18. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Musterd, S. 2020b. “Towards Further Understanding of Urban Segregation.” In Handbook of Urban Segregation, edited by S. Musterd, 411–424. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nijs, G., and A. Daems. 2012. “And What if the Tangible Were Not, and Vice Versa? on Boundary Works in Everyday Mobility Experience of People Moving into Old Age: For Daisy (1909–2011).” Space and Culture 15 (3): 186–197. doi:10.1177/1206331212445962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldenburg, R. 1989. The Great Good Place. Cafés, Coffee Shops, Booksrores, Bars, Hair Salons and Other Hangouts at the Heart of a Community. Cambridge: Da Capo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ottoni, C. A., J. Sims-Gould, M. Winters, M. Heijnen, and H. A. McKay. 2016. “‘Benches Become like Porches’: Built and Social Environment Influences Older Adults’ Experiences of Mobility and Wellbeing.” Social Science & Medicine 169: 33–41. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallasmaa, J. 2005. The Eyes of the Skin. Architecture and the Senses. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Peattie, L. 1998. “Convivial Cities.” In Cities for Citizens, edited by M. Douglass and J. Friedmann, 247–253. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Radice, M. 2016. “Unpacking Intercultural Conviviality in Multiethnic Commercial Streets.” Journal of Intercultural Studies 37 (5): 432–448. doi:10.1080/07256868.2016.1211624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saikkonen, P., K. Hannikainen, T. Kauppinen, J. Rasinkangas, and M. Vaalavuo. 2018. “Sosiaalinen Kestävyys: Asuminen, Segregaatio Ja Tuloerot Kolmella Kaupunkiseudulla.” Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos, raportteja 2/2018.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. 2003. Cosmopolis II: Mongrel Cities in the Twenty-First Century. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 1990. Conscience of the Eye. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Shafaieh, C. 2019. “On Materiality Kinfolk, and Norm Architects.” The Touch. Spaces Designed for the Senses. Kinfolk & Norm Architects. Berlin: Gestalten 128–129
   Google Scholar
• Skifter Andersen, H. 2002. “Excluded Places: The Interaction between Segregation, Urban Decay and Deprived Neighbourhoods.” Housing, Theory and Society 19 (4): 153–169. doi:10.1080/140360902321122860.
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E. 2006. “Design that Enables Diversity: The Complications of a Planning Ideal.” Journal of Planning Literature 20 (3): 233–249. doi:10.1177/0885412205283104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonkiss, F. 2003. “The Ethics of Indifference. Community and Solitude in the City.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 6 (3): 297–311. doi:10.1177/13678779030063004.
   Google Scholar
• Tonkiss, F. 2013. Cities by Design. The Social Life of Urban Form. Cambridge: Polity Press. iBooks version.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, G. 2008. “Living with Difference: Reflections on Geographies of Encounter.” Progress in Human Geography 32 (3): 323–337. doi:10.1177/0309133308089372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Aalst, I., and J. Brands. 2020. “Young People: Being Apart, Together in an Urban Park.” Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability. doi:10.1080/17549175.2020.1737181.
   Google Scholar
• Van Melik, R., and R. Pijpers. 2017. “Older People’s Self‐Selected Spaces of Encounter in Urban Aging Environments in the Netherlands.” City & Community 16 (3): 284–303. doi:10.1111/cic0.12246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallin, A. 2019. “Kaupunkitilan ja Eläkeläisten Sosiaalisen Toiminnan Tarkastelua.” PhD diss., Tampere University.
   Google Scholar
• Warf, B., and S. Arias. 2009. “Introduction: The Reinsertion of Space into the Social Sciences and Humanities.” In The Spatial Turn. Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by B. Warf and S. Arias, 1–10. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wessendorf, S. 2016. “Settling in a Super-Diverse Context: Recent Migrants’ Experiences of Conviviality.” Journal of Intercultural Studies 37 (5): 449–463. doi:10.1080/07256868.2016.1211623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. 2007. “Global Age-Friendly Cities: A Guide” World Health Organization. Accessed 14 April 2020. https://www.who.int/ageing/publications/Global_age_friendly_cities_Guide_English.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, W. H. 1980. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Washington, DC: Conservation Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, A., and G. Noble. 2016. “Convivialities: An Orientation.” Journal of Intercultural Studies 37 (5): 423–431. doi:10.1080/07256868.2016.1213786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar