Figures & data
Table 1. LCA of SOFCs in the scientific literature.
Table 2. Data referred to a single anode-supported SOFC.
Table 3. Inventory of the current and future SOFCs.
Table 4. GWP impacts [kg CO2 eq.] of components and materials of current SOFCs and future SOFCs.
Table 5. GWP impacts [kg CO2 eq.] of material extraction and manufacturing of current SOFCs and future SOFCs.
Figure 4. GWP impacts comparison of components and materials of future SOFCs with planar and tubular layout (where 100% is the GWP of current SOFCs).
![Figure 4. GWP impacts comparison of components and materials of future SOFCs with planar and tubular layout (where 100% is the GWP of current SOFCs).](/cms/asset/03c65017-5d87-4b1f-9914-e6e73bc23d05/tsue_a_2355899_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. GWP impacts comparison of components and materials of tubular future SOFCs with different diameter to length ratio (where 100% is the GWP of current SOFCs).
![Figure 5. GWP impacts comparison of components and materials of tubular future SOFCs with different diameter to length ratio (where 100% is the GWP of current SOFCs).](/cms/asset/71eb4c4e-4f8c-4118-84ca-e8a69f30c9f2/tsue_a_2355899_f0005_oc.jpg)
Figure 6. GWP impacts comparison of components and materials of future SOFCs with different specific power (where 100% is the GWP of current SOFCs).
![Figure 6. GWP impacts comparison of components and materials of future SOFCs with different specific power (where 100% is the GWP of current SOFCs).](/cms/asset/d0488d26-01ad-4a0c-a05e-8360cbce60b3/tsue_a_2355899_f0006_oc.jpg)
Figure 7. GWP impacts comparison of components and materials of future SOFCs with different active surface (where 100% is the GWP of current SOFCs).
![Figure 7. GWP impacts comparison of components and materials of future SOFCs with different active surface (where 100% is the GWP of current SOFCs).](/cms/asset/6fb3996d-f2a7-468c-9641-e8a25995353b/tsue_a_2355899_f0007_oc.jpg)
Figure 8. GWP impacts comparison of components and materials of future SOFCs with different thickness of anode, electrolyte and cathode (where 100% is the GWP of current SOFCs).
![Figure 8. GWP impacts comparison of components and materials of future SOFCs with different thickness of anode, electrolyte and cathode (where 100% is the GWP of current SOFCs).](/cms/asset/c20724a4-f387-4832-8792-50e6ceaecbf9/tsue_a_2355899_f0008_oc.jpg)
Figure 9. GWP impacts comparison of components and materials of future SOFCs used for stationary and mobile and more dynamic applications (where 100% is the GWP of current SOFCs).
![Figure 9. GWP impacts comparison of components and materials of future SOFCs used for stationary and mobile and more dynamic applications (where 100% is the GWP of current SOFCs).](/cms/asset/5705e6f0-45e1-4fa8-8a64-27df630c2a07/tsue_a_2355899_f0009_oc.jpg)
Table A1. Considered patents about the future SOFCs and data extracted from them (where Stat = stationary, Mob = mobile/dynamic).
Data availability statement
Data derived from public domain resources.