6,728
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Report

Defining the right diluent for intravenous infusion of therapeutic antibodies

, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Article: 1685814 | Received 25 Sep 2019, Accepted 21 Oct 2019, Published online: 27 Nov 2019

Figures & data

Figure 1. Routes of administration for therapeutic antibodies

(a) Routes of administration for 97 therapeutic antibodies that were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (as of December 2018): intravenous infusion (63%, n = 61), subcutaneous (SC) injection (34%, n = 33), intramuscular (IM) and intravitreal injection (3%, n = 3). (b) Among the 57 mAbs that require further dilution for IV infusion, saline solution is acceptable for use with 98% (n = 56) products, while 5% dextrose solution and other diluents (0.45% sodium chloride or lactated ringer’s solution) are only recommended for 30% (n = 17) and 11% (n = 6) therapeutic antibodies, respectively. Remarkably, dextrose solution is prohibited for use with 33% (n = 19) antibody products. Note that four of the 61 antibodies that are administered through IV infusion require no dilution. Data were obtained from the Drugs@FDA website (https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/).
Figure 1. Routes of administration for therapeutic antibodies

Table 1. Diluents approved for intravenous infusion of therapeutic antibodies

Table 2. Therapeutic antibodies tested for compatibility with dextrose and human serum in vitro

Figure 2. Aggregation of therapeutic mAbs after mixing with dextrose and human serum in vitro

A panel of 11 therapeutic mAbs, named mAb-1 to mAb-11, were tested for their compatibility with diluents and human serum under in vitro conditions (see Materials and Methods). Aliquots of therapeutic mAbs, which were prepared from their original formulations, were diluted into (a) 5% dextrose in water (D5W), (b) saline (0.9% sodium chloride), and (c) lactated Ringer’s solution (containing 0.6% sodium chloride), followed by mixing with human serum. After incubation at 25°C for 30 minutes, the resultant insoluble pellets, if any, were collected by centrifugation and analyzed by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis. When diluted with 5% dextrose (a), insoluble protein aggregates were detected for therapeutic mAbs (mAb-1, mAb-3, mAb-5, mAb-7, and mAb-8) which were present in acidic pH (5.2 to 6.5) and nonionic formulation buffers. A lower amount of aggregates was also detected for mAb-2, which was formulated in pH 5.5 buffer containing 50 mM sodium chloride. In contrast, little or no aggregates were detected for mAb-10 and mAb-11 that were both formulated in pH 7.2 to 7.5 or other mAbs (mAb-4, mAb-6, and mAb-9) whose formulations were acidic (pH 5.8–6.5) and contained sodium chloride. When diluted with ionic diluent (saline or lactated Ringer’s solution) (b and c), no protein aggregates were detected across the 11 mAbs when mixed with human serum. * Shown are the pH values and NaCl concentrations of individual mAb formulation buffers and the corresponding IgG isotypes. ** The faint bands indicate basal protein adsorption to the microtube inner surface (Supplement I). Shown are representative images of duplicate experiments.
Figure 2. Aggregation of therapeutic mAbs after mixing with dextrose and human serum in vitro

Figure 3. pH-dependence of protein aggregation of therapeutic mAbs in mixtures with dextrose and human serum

The indicated D5W-mAb mixtures were adjusted to (a) pH 5.3–5.9, (b) pH 6.1–6.4, (c) pH 6.7–6.9, and (d) pH 7.3–7.7 with citrate-phosphate buffers (pH 5.0, 5.8, 6.6, and 7.6). The resultant samples were incubated with human serum and analyzed for potential protein aggregates. (a) At pH 5.3–5.9, all 11 mAbs formed insoluble aggregates, displaying similar band patterns on SDS-PAGE, with lower levels of aggregates being seen for mAbs in ionic formulations (mAbs 2, 4, 6, 9, and 11). (b-d) The levels of protein aggregates decreased by raising pH in the D5W-buffer-mAb mixtures. (e) Lanes 1–6, the indicated mAbs in acidic formulations formed massive aggregates after incubation with dextrose and serum at 25°C for 15 minutes. Lanes 7–12, duplicate samples were incubated for an additional 15 minutes after adjusting to pH 7.3–7.6. The preformed aggregates were no longer detectable in the resultant samples.
Figure 3. pH-dependence of protein aggregation of therapeutic mAbs in mixtures with dextrose and human serum

Figure 4. Ionic strength-dependence of aggregation of therapeutic mAbs in mixtures with dextrose and human serum

(a) The indicated mAbs were mixed with a NaCl-containing dextrose solution (D5W + 0.45% NaCl (77 mM)) and human serum. At such ionic strength, little or no aggregates were detected across all the samples. (b) Aliquots of mAb-1 were diluted into D5W solutions with varying amounts of NaCl. The mixed solutions were adjusted to pH 5.0–5.3 with citrate-phosphate buffer (pH 5.0). When incubated with serum, the presence of NaCl suppressed aggregate formation in a dose-dependent manner. (c) Aliquots of 10% NaCl were added to the six D5W-mAb-serum solutions that contained the most aggregates (lanes 1–6) to mimic physiological NaCl concentration (final concentration 0.9% or 154 mM). After an additional 15 minutes of incubation, little or no aggregates were detected across the samples (lanes 7–12).
Figure 4. Ionic strength-dependence of aggregation of therapeutic mAbs in mixtures with dextrose and human serum

Table 3. Comparison of protein aggregates in the mAb-dextrose mixtures with human serum and plasma

Figure 5. Comparison of protein aggregates in the mAb-dextrose mixtures with serum and plasma

The indicated mAbs were diluted into dextrose at pH 4.7–6.2 and incubated with human plasma and serum, respectively, as in and . (a) Serum mediated protein aggregates (left panel) showed similar band patterns as those of plasma (right panel) on SDS-PAGE. Duplicate aggregate samples were subjected to in-solution trypsin digestion followed by LC-MS/MS analysis revealing 14 of the most abundant proteins (). (b) Insoluble protein aggregates were prepared using mAb-7 and mAb-10 after mixing with dextrose at indicated pH and incubation with human serum and plasma, respectively. After resolving by SDS-PAGE, a set of 12 major protein bands (labeled 1 to 12) were retrieved for in-gel trypsin digestion followed by protein identification. (c) Shown are the most abundant protein(s) identified in the corresponding bands. * Proteins that were found in the aggregates from using plasma, but were absent in those of serum.
Figure 5. Comparison of protein aggregates in the mAb-dextrose mixtures with serum and plasma

Figure 6. Potential biochemical pathways driving protein aggregation at the IV infusion interface

Therapeutic mAbs, especially those formulated in acidic buffers (pH ≤ 6.5) with low ionic strength, could form insoluble protein aggregates at the interface of IV infusion with blood components when diluted into a nonionic dextrose for intravenous infusion (). The underlying biochemical pathways may involve isoelectric precipitation of abundant plasma proteins (e.g., complement proteins) whose pI values are proximate to the formulation pH of the mAb (). This hypothesis is supported by the evidence that protein aggregation was effectively prevented by increasing ionic strength and/or pH in the mAb-diluent solution ( and ). By contrast, no protein aggregation was detected for mAbs that are formulated at physiological pH (mAb-10 and mAb-11) even when mixed with nonionic dextrose and human serum ().
Figure 6. Potential biochemical pathways driving protein aggregation at the IV infusion interface
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download Zip (1.6 MB)