Figures & data
Figure 1a. A timeline showing MAb discovery technologies providing an alternative to the use of mice as immunization hosts juxtaposed with the development and approval of therapeutic MAbs from divergent species such as camelids, rabbits, and chickens. Figure 1b. A graph showing the increasing use of divergent species in the discovery of therapeutic MAbs now in preclinical and clinical development. Data obtained from the TABS therapeutic antibody database show over 150 MAbs to date that were derived from divergent species.
A 3-panel figure illustrating the relationship between HCDR3 length and paratope shape of antibodies with concave, flat, and protruding paratopes. Each panel shows the interface between the protein target and the antibody molecule where the antibody is shown as a space-filling ribbon diagram, and the HCDR3 region is highlighted in red.
A bar graph depicting the analysis of HCDR3 sequences found in 137 late stage and approved MAbs and categorized according to predicted paratope topology of non-protruding, variable topology, and protruding, based on a study by Ramsland et al., 2001.
Two side-by-side bar graphs showing the percent amino acid identities of human drug targets versus mouse and chicken orthologs. The patterns of the two graphs are markedly different with many more drug targets being highly conserved between humans and mice.
A 3-panel figure showing the similarities and differences in amino acid identity of human versus mouse, and human versus chicken SLC2A4 depicted using ribbon diagrams. Panel A shows a side view of the protein target illustrating its small extracellular loops. Panels B and C show the top view of the protein highlighting amino acid differences on the extracellular loops between the human protein versus mouse and chicken orthologs respectively.
Supplemental material