555
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Determination of urea in pet feed: assessing the suitability of different analytical techniques using proficiency test data

ORCID Icon, , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 249-260 | Received 12 Oct 2023, Accepted 27 Dec 2023, Published online: 07 Feb 2024

Figures & data

Table 1. HPLC gradient elution program.

Table 2. Mass spectrometry acquisition settings.

Figure 1. Extracted ion chromatograms of (a) urea (m/z 61 > 44) in test material C containing 258.9 mg kg−1 of urea and (b) internal standard 13C15N2 urea (m/z 64 > 46) at a mass fraction of 526 mg kg−1.

Figure 1. Extracted ion chromatograms of (a) urea (m/z 61 > 44) in test material C containing 258.9 mg kg−1 of urea and (b) internal standard 13C15N2 urea (m/z 64 > 46) at a mass fraction of 526 mg kg−1.

Table 3. Reference values of urea and moisture contents of the test materials accompanied by the respective uncertainty values (k = 2).

Table 4. Results (mg kg−1) of urea in the test materials J, C and G, as submitted by the interlaboratory study participants.

Figure 2. Distribution of the results submitted by the PT participants for the test materials J, C and G organized by analytical technique. Note: The horizontal line represents the reference mass fraction of urea in each test material. The uncertainties of the reference values are indicated in .

Figure 2. Distribution of the results submitted by the PT participants for the test materials J, C and G organized by analytical technique. Note: The horizontal line represents the reference mass fraction of urea in each test material. The uncertainties of the reference values are indicated in Table 3.

Table 5. Statistical parameters of the interlaboratory test: robust mean (ISO 5725-5) and reproducibility (RSDR).

Table 6. Performance parameters of the methods used by the participants.

Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (43 KB)