Determination of urea in pet feed: assessing the suitability of different analytical techniques using proficiency test data

References

• BIOR. 2017. Determination of carbamide in pet food using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, validation report – method code: BIOR-T-012-189-2017, Riga. https://bior.lv/en/product/1036.
   Google Scholar
• Boehringer_Mannheim/R-Biopharm. Enzymatic bioanalysis/food analysis – urea/ammonia UV-method for the determination of urea and ammonia in foodstuffs and other materials and for the determination of nitrogen after Kjeldahl-digestion, Cat. No. 10 542 946 035 [accessed 2024 Jan 27]. https://food.r-biopharm.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/roche_ifu_urea-ammonia_10542946035_en-v5_2019-11.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Clark S, Francis PS, Conlan XA, Barnett NW. 2007. Determination of urea using high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection after automated derivatisation with xanthydrol. J Chromatogr A. 1161(1–2):207–213. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.05.085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC. 2009. Commission regulation (EC) No 152/2009 of 27 January 2009 laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of feed. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Union L 54/1.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2012. Commission implementing regulation (EU) No 839/2012 of 18 September 2012 concerning the authorisation of urea as a feed additive for ruminants. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Union L 252/11.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2023. RASFF window – European Commission rapid alert system for food and feed [accessed 2023 Mar 28]. https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/rasff-window/screen/search.
   Google Scholar
• EFSA. 2012. EFSA panel on additives and products or substances used in animal feed (FEEDAP). Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of urea for ruminants. EFSA J. 10(3):2624. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2624.
   Google Scholar
• Finete VLM, Gouvêa MM, Marques FFdC, Netto ADP. 2013. Is it possible to screen for milk or whey protein adulteration with melamine, urea and ammonium sulphate, combining Kjeldahl and classical spectrophotometric methods? Food Chem. 141(4):3649–3655. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.06.046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flannelly L, Dillon GP, Moran CA. 2019. A comparison of analytical methods for the determination of urea in yeast-based food and feed ingredients. Food Additiv Contam A. 36 (10):1467–1474. doi:10.1080/19440049.2019.1644457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis PS. 2006. The determination of urea in wine – a review. Aust J Grape Wine Res. 12(2):97–106. doi:10.1111/j.1755-0238.2006.tb00048.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves C, Bouten K, Dehouck P, Robouch P, Stroka J, Cizek-Stroh A, Emteborg H, Vincent U, von Holst C. 2020. EURL-FA control proficiency test report: determination of the mass fraction of urea in pet feed. JRC Technical Reports, June 2020, JRC121113. Geel (Belgium): JRC Geel.
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves C, Bouten K, Emteborg H, Stroka J, von Holst C, Vincent U. 2022. Determination of urea in compound feed for ruminants: interlaboratory comparison for the validation of the spectrophotometric method in commission regulation (EC) No 152/2009. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ. 26(S):295–302. doi:10.25518/1780-4507.20069.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2006. ISO guide 35, reference materials—general and statistical principles for certification. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organisation for Standardization
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2015. ISO 13528 statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organisation for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO_5725-5. 1998. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results – part 5: alternative methods for the determination of the precision of a standard measurement method. Geneve, Switzerland: International Organisation for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• JRC. 2018. Joint Research Centre’s Metrological InterLaboratory Comparison (MILC) platform for registration, result’s submission and evaluaton of ILC's data, ver. 8. Geel (Belgium).
   Google Scholar
• Krämer M, Fry H, Kappenstein O. 2021. Development and validation of two analytical methods for urea determination in compound feed, including pet food, and yeast using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with fluorescence detection and tandem mass spectrometry. Food Addit Contam Part A. 38(6):931–942. doi:10.1080/19440049.2021.1901999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Dash S. 2021. Evaporation-based low-cost method for the detection of adulterant in milk. ACS Omega. 6(41):27200–27207. doi:10.1021/acsomega.1c03887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labanca RA, Glória MBA. 2008. Spectrophotometric determination of urea in sugar cane distilled spirits. J Agric Food Chem. 56(13):5211–5215. doi:10.1021/jf800520e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacMahon S, Begley TH, Diachenko GW, Stromgren SA. 2012. A liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method for the detection of economically motivated adulteration in protein-containing foods. J Chromatogr A. 1220:101–107. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2011.11.066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Keeffe M, Sherington J. 1983. Comparison of three methods for the determination of urea in compound feed and silage. Analyst. 108(1292):1374–1379. doi:10.1039/an9830801374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pibarot P, Pilard S. 2012. Analysis of urea in petfood matrices: comparison of spectro-colorimetric, enzymatic and liquid chromatography electrospray ionization high resolution mass spectrometry methods. AJAC. 03(09):613–621. doi:10.4236/ajac.2012.39080.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson M, Sykes M, Wood R. 2020. Comparisons between reproducibility standard deviations (SDR) derived from proficiency tests and from collaborative trials: mycotoxins in food. Accred Qual Assur. 25(1):61–68. doi:10.1007/s00769-019-01413-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veiga MJ, Herbert P, Simões T, Oliveira A, Alves A. 2005. Poster P-III-16: determination of urea in port wine by HPLC with fluorescence detection after derivatization with 9-xanthydrol. Presented at the 4th International Conference on Instrumental Methods of Analysis: modern trends and applications; October 2 − 6; Crete, Greece: Iraklion.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Liu G, Zhang Y, Gao Q, Wang D, Liu H. 2014. Simultaneous determination of ethyl carbamate and urea in alcoholic beverages by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with fluorescence detection. J Agric Food Chem. 62(13):2797–2802. doi:10.1021/jf405400y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar